They are fake pictures, just as shops use, is it fake service? Their are so many fucking good punts amongst these fake pictures………its laughable to imagine so many won't go because they image searched lmfao…………
They are fake pictures, just as shops use, is it fake service? Their are so many fucking good punts amongst these fake pictures………its laughable to imagine so many won't go because they image searched lmfao…………
KEEPING THE BASTARDS HONEST
I think the original point of this thread was missed...as stated in the title, it was a request for sharing of information regarding skim privates on backpages. The fact that most of the photos on backpages are fake was just a secondary issue and quite a valid gripe btw. I don't personally have a problem with shops like N5M/42 and Ginza us Ng photoshopped images as usually I can still see that the girls are the girls we are getting. It's the ones where the girls are nowhere close to the images used like say Zinia 311/Strathfield that I take offence. So same rule othumb applies to backpage photos but in general have found them way closer to Zinia's lead than say N5M.
So back on topic, anyone have any slim privates found on backpage that they'd like to share? Comments regarding the accuracy or lack thereof of their photos are appreciated too but secondary to their slimness. Younger grls appreciated too (below 30 ideally or at least below a well kept 35/40 say like Kitty from Midas)
Not too many people sharing? I guess that would mean that there isn't any slim privates advertising on Cracker, Backpage, Locanto and the like, especially to those not willing to get off their ass and go see for themselves.
Or Would It……….
KEEPING THE BASTARDS HONEST
Backpage/Cracker future of internet era connection, but needs time to manifest as a bulletproof tool...m