100 Annerley rd

[Hammered]

Yeah I agree with you to an extent but there’s a difference in that hookers are allowed to do what they do so the comparison isn’t the same. BUT, if I went to a brothel and a hooker let me bareback her because I thought or at least she let me think it was a bonus service JUST for me I wouldn’t come online and tell everyone about it because I would respect the boundaries she laid down by implying it was something only offered to me, feelings or not.

It’s not a morality issue really, I mean if my local coffee shop gave me extra shots for free because I was a loyal customer I wouldn’t go tell other customers about it because then they’re gonna go expecting the same thing.. it’d be something I’d keep to myself out of respect. Same same.

There’s no definitive right or wrong, and extreme examples exist, but basing a rule on them isn’t a great idea.

It all boils down to the anonymity that this forum, and anything online, really, affords to people and the resulting drop in social norms.

[ecchi.gaijin]

I wasn’t using “take advantage” in the SJW sense of the phrase. There’s no power imbalance as far as I’m concerned. It’s a transaction. No different than a restaurant providing food and table service. The fact that it’s more intimate shouldn’t give rise to a morality argument. Hookers do the same and more and are reviewed, too. People are entitled to report, however disrespectful you might find it, on their experiences with MLs. Same as any other supply/demand contracted service. Emotions are what muddies the conversational waters.

There is a HUGE power imbalance in a massage room. Only with the experienced and confident MLs is there a power balance.

If there was no power imbalance, BW would be celibate. lol

[Hammered]

There is a HUGE power imbalance in a massage room. Only with the experienced and confident MLs is there a power balance.

If there was no power imbalance, BW would be celibate. lol

I don’t agree. It’s a contractual agreement. Money for services. If one or another is better at negotiating, that’s just part of the game we play called Capitalism.

[brownwallaby]

not sure what EG means by experienced and confident MLs but lately I regularly visited those popular shops incl the one that just shut down recently, and got very similar results and values, and always paid below ‘standard’ rates

[Batting100]

not sure what EG means by experienced and confident MLs but lately I regularly visited those popular shops incl the one that just shut down recently, and got very similar results and values, and always paid below ‘standard’ rates

Hahaha hahaha you absolutely did not

[ecchi.gaijin]

I don’t agree. It’s a contractual agreement. Money for services. If one or another is better at negotiating, that’s just part of the game we play called Capitalism.

If that were true we wouldn't have sexual harassment laws.

[Bobuq123]

Met the flower from mountainous country in other shop. So glad I found one of those lovelies. Session was exceptional. It's a kind of welcome treat. Got to know they all gg reunion sooner or later. Cant wait to see others.

[Hammered]

If that were true we wouldn't have sexual harassment laws.

Sexual harassment laws have little to do with sex worker situations.
In “normal” working conditions, there is no implied or explicit contract of money for sexual services. With sex workers, that’s exactly the contract.

[reddoor]

Met the flower from mountainous country in other shop. So glad I found one of those lovelies. Session was exceptional. It's a kind of welcome treat. Got to know they all gg reunion sooner or later. Cant wait to see others.

Saw her once but can't say i found her very sexy, maybe in prebub days. One of the hottest and most talented still in the area.

[nosha]

Saw her once but can't say i found her very sexy, maybe in prebub days. One of the hottest and most talented still in the area.

Do share more... does anyone know what happened to the Mexican beer

[Bobuq123]

Saw her once but can't say i found her very sexy, maybe in prebub days. One of the hottest and most talented still in the area.

YAh, you are right. not in terms of sexy. But the value of service wise and commitment.

[brownwallaby]

YAh, you are right. not in terms of sexy. But the value of service wise and commitment.

True, for 1.4P she was really enthusiastic, it was an action packed 60 minute

[Maddona]

On reflection and further details. This post is on hold a little bit. My apologies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Kowabunga]

A nearby southern shop removed it's specific and related advertising.

[revolnaisa]

CM.jpg
Wonder why?
From SundayMail today

[Mister Reality]

Todays Sunday Mail has a puff piece from QPS Comms says 'customers on one online adult services forum openly discussed booking workers from a Brisbane southside massage parlour said to offer "extras" via Wechat". So yeah Police do use these forums for easy intel.

It will be interesting to see if there will be more action or why this piece was run.
It did highlight the intent to attack organised crime. Best to be tight with info i guess

[ecchi.gaijin]

Sexual harassment laws have little to do with sex worker situations.
In “normal” working conditions, there is no implied or explicit contract of money for sexual services. With sex workers, that’s exactly the contract.

I would love to see you try that as your defense in court. "yes your honor, it was an implied term of the contract of service when I walked into the massage shop that I would get sexual services"..... *in comes the Bailiff with handcuffs*

The contract for service you are paying for is MASSAGE. Anything you negotiate with the ML is called an extra IF she agrees to it. There are well established shops in Brisbane that have a reputation of MLs rejecting customers requests, so to say it is implied in the contract is utterly wrong.

[Kowabunga]

100 Annerley did not use WeChat

[Hammered]

I would love to see you try that as your defense in court. "yes your honor, it was an implied term of the contract of service when I walked into the massage shop that I would get sexual services"..... *in comes the Bailiff with handcuffs*

The contract for service you are paying for is MASSAGE. Anything you negotiate with the ML is called an extra IF she agrees to it. There are well established shops in Brisbane that have a reputation of MLs rejecting customers requests, so to say it is implied in the contract is utterly wrong.

You just made my point by trying to argue against it.
Yes, initially the massage is the contract. Then ANOTHER negotiation is done, where services for money is agreed upon. That’s a contract. Regardless of how shaky the foundation may be, it’s the oldest form of contract that exists. A verbal contract. If the ML does NOT agree, then there’s no contract.

Sexual harassment is a civil matter until things progress to assault. That doesn’t mean physically touching, just the implied or assumed threat of harm. So to suggest that an appearance in court handcuffed for sexual harassment for negotiations of extras is utterly wrong. But hey, maybe you’re a little more aggressive and domineering with how you do it?

[The Professor]

You just made my point by trying to argue against it.
Yes, initially the massage is the contract. Then ANOTHER negotiation is done, where services for money is agreed upon. That’s a contract. Regardless of how shaky the foundation may be, it’s the oldest form of contract that exists. A verbal contract. If the ML does NOT agree, then there’s no contract. Sexual harassment is a civil matter until things progress to assault. That doesn’t mean physically touching, just the implied or assumed threat of harm. So to suggest that an appearance in court handcuffed for sexual harassment for negotiations of extras is utterly wrong. But hey, maybe you’re a little more aggressive and domineering with how you do it?

Boys boys boys - yes a verbal contract is binding. But proving it in a court is usually a "he said, she said" scenario and without corroborating evidence there is reasonable doubt so goodbye to that one. And of course we all know sexual services do not happen in MS so are you going to implicate yourself and the ML? Hammered give up trying to make some posters on here see reason - by their posts some obviously have nothing to do and then end up calling ppl names. How do you know when you've won an argument ? They resort to name calling.