Quote Originally Posted by todawac View Post
Religion back in the days were used by monarchies as a way to establish alliances, combined with marrying off their young princesses to an old king who can't even get hard anymore to seal some sort of treaty. Monarchy benefits the male members but not the female members.

The problem with republican democracies though, is that successful politicians are those with early life influence - USyd debate student majoring in political science, lives in Double Bay or the Eastern suburbs and moves out west to "usurp" seats and tell locals that he's a local only because he changed his address on his driver's licence.

Most get into politics for the benefit of landing a bigger role right after serving their terms. Like the John Barilaro scandal where the NSW govt under Gladys removed the woman who was right for the job only to install Mr Barilaro for that New York job. He wasn't even in the shortlist for successful candidates.
Theocracy came first and was well before monarchy. No one is born noble, with a title nor do they have blue blood. Theocracy was created to maintain social order and keep the primates in check. At some point the primitives rebelled and demanded a king rule over them and that's how monarchy came about. As for Prince Harry the only blood he's got is beta simp blood.