Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: First he gets scammed, then he's found guilty

  1. #1
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    6,416

    First he gets scammed, then he's found guilty

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/...lsgj.html?btis

    The 16 year old scammers probably got off with only juvey and no conviction.
    For all we know, this guy could've been white knighting thinking he could try to get the "girl" out of the "business".
    So what if he's got condoms on him, right? ... Maybe he should've been "prepared" to BB the 15 yo instead? FFS...

    Moral of the story: never try to white knight when sex is involved. Dating sites, sugaring sites, whatever. It's all the same.

  2. #2
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    06-02-2025
    Posts
    75
    He aint getting any pity from me. He was happy to put he's dick into a 15 year old girl, let that be a lesson for him.

    A man of he's age should have more control of he's sexual urges. Thats what brothels are for.

  3. #3
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    219
    Quote Originally Posted by Xen View Post
    Sydney Morning Herald paywall. You got another link?
    https://archive.md/tw2VQ

    or copy link in
    https://12ft.io/

  4. #4
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    6,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Misohappy View Post
    He aint getting any pity from me. He was happy to put he's dick into a 15 year old girl, let that be a lesson for him.

    A man of he's age should have more control of he's sexual urges. Thats what brothels are for.
    What 15 yo girl? There was none. He was being scammed by a couple of 16 yo dudes. And this wasn't a police sting either.

    I also do not understand what the point the judge was trying to make about the condoms. Does that mean we shouldn't be carrying condoms in case it could be used against us as incriminating evidence? That's ridiculous IMO.

  5. #5
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    29-03-2025
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldfishMan View Post
    What 15 yo girl? There was none. He was being scammed by a couple of 16 yo dudes. And this wasn't a police sting either.

    I also do not understand what the point the judge was trying to make about the condoms. Does that mean we shouldn't be carrying condoms in case it could be used against us as incriminating evidence? That's ridiculous IMO.
    The point is that the thought there was a 15 year old girl. And what 66 year old carries condoms AND lube when going to meet a 15 year old girl? And it’s irrelevant whether it was a police sting or not.
    It’s all pretty obvious.

  6. #6
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    26-05-2024
    Posts
    407
    Sure, he may have intended to be ‘her’ white knight … after he fucked ‘her’. Dude doesn’t agree to meet a (hypothetical) young girl who makes it clear she wants sex in a fucking hotel room just to convince her she’s doing the wrong thing. The condoms and lube were just icing on the cake for the prosecution.

  7. #7
    Baby Member(留言版初哥)
    Join Date
    17-07-2024
    Posts
    47
    Yaa white knighting and all that bullshit. Take his ass to jail.

  8. #8
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    09-11-2024
    Posts
    239
    [QUOTE=GoldfishMan;3417626]What 15 yo girl? There was none. He was being scammed by a couple of 16 yo dudes. And this wasn't a police sting either.

    I also do not understand what the point the judge was trying to make about the condoms. Does that mean we shouldn't be carrying condoms in case it could be used against us as incriminating evidence? That's ridiculous
    Last edited by Roydemeo; 30-04-2025 at 07:18 AM. Reason: Change of opinion

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •