These used to be my regular shops a few years ago, until I tried Ginza.
Nevertheless, both shops are better than 429a Pitt.
although there are not that many as the other more popular places there are some ARs - i think just pick the shop in the prefix but the ARs might be bit outdated/girl no longer working there
the one good thing about the place is its super clean and very nice big spacious rooms and both shops offer a decent lineup even during rush hour
the con is the girls can be bit of hit and miss and can be awkward when you see the lineup but not interested and wanna walk away lol. But i think theres another thread somewhere which commented on the gems at that place
dayuuumm both girls look amazing even if they are 80% close to the photos and their price point might indicate its worth to ToFTT
Dont think you can go wrong with either and Kiara seems to be another to add to the list
https://www.surryhillsbrothel.com.au...t/kiara-japan/
But i woudlnt really recommend Miku if you wanna play things safe and also want above average service
https://citybrothel.com.au/project/miku-japan-3/
Man every time i go to these shops i regret it every single time.
I keep getting baited back though, whoever does this shop's photoshoping, is on another level.
Sakura and Kyoto are good and the rooms and shop's in general are very clean. The times I have been there are with regulars from other shops like Ginza, No 5, 42 Glades etc.
Based on that, I've had good service but I guess that is because the girls I have seen are the ones I have seen at other shops. Management seem good and always accommodating. Sakura's papasan is a good bloke but I forget his name.
Majority of the girls that work at both shops have worked at other shops around the city. Hope this helps.
Hmm, back in the day they were pretty close I think i've only ever seen 2 good girls in this shop YEARS ago Chinese girl named Mimi and another Chinese girl named Layla.
However, that was YEARS ago, every other time i've gone to 206/57 the pictures are like 60-70% accurate.
And the photos are taken INSIDE the shop too, so it's a combination of the absolute BEST angles and photoshop skills that baits me every time. I don't expect shops to be honest with their photos and even descriptions (I wish they were). However, this shop doesn't have the girl's size/weight in the description. This is pretty much the only thing i look for since i like slim/skinny girls (<50kg). So yea, no size/weight in the description so the only thing i have to go off are the pictures. Which every single fucking time, i'm like "The photos are taken in the shop!! how bad could it be" and i get burned every time (only a handful of times).
I think my description makes it sound a lot worse than it actually is, i shall add that it's not so THAT bad. The girl's aren't "ugly", just don't expect anything close to the photos. Maybe i've just been unlucky however, and my sample size is just too small.
That being said, i pretty much only punt Ginza now, and even Ginza's photos are very inaccurate. The photos taken inside the room are okay, but i don't trust a single photo that's not taken in the room. However, the only thing i look for is size/weight and Ginza has been pretty accurate on that so far. Again, the girls have never been ugly, in fact almost all girls i've seen are better than average, i just mean the photos are not accurate.
Singaporean June from Sakura Place took my punting ‘virginity’ many many years ago. I think i only went back for another 4 occasions in the past 15 years, and they have been good punts. Never been to 206 thou
"Vidi, Vici, Veni"
"I saw, I conquered, I came"
its kinda like asking and seeing a girl in person vs from their social reels or seeing them with less makeup
I saw a girl there and she actually looked better than the photos and thats why i picked her... but i'd say in overall most girls look quite abit touched in person and once you take away the beauty filters well... Your best bet at these 2 shops if u fancy a lineup is to ignore the photos and go for lineup and pick as the rooms are new and spacious but service can be a hit and miss
Agreed the rooms are quite clean and very spacious both the room itself and the showers but perhaps lacking some mirrors. Who have you seen that you recommend and are still working there?
Lol.... if majority of the girls working there are from other shops.. isnt this potentially a bad sign? As in there's a chance they were fired so ended up there?
Coincidentally popped into Kyoto206 recently for the first time in a long while after getting having a rare bad experience at GC. The good news is that they've finally dropped their prices to match the Ginza's and they also still do a line up which is much better than choosing off an iPad if you're not sure on timing or just like to see the available girls in the flesh before picking. The bad news was that on selecting a beautiful and friendly J girl called Hibia, the standard of service was the same as it always was at this place (very average) and just not up to the usual Ginza services standard which keeps me coming back. I also notice on the roster that they've got a few ex Ginza girls like J Iris who is now J Ayaka at Kyoto https://citybrothel.com.au/project/ayaka-japan/
For me I still prefer the Ginza's but the gap is closing and in truth I think both sets of shops GC/GE and Kyoto/Sakura have lots of room for improvement.
Here is the hottest girl from Kyoto that also has a porn video. Total babe, 10/10. I dare you to find a hotter girl than her in Sydney right now.
Her profile: https://citybrothel.com.au/project/reika-japan/
Her porn video(you're welcome): https://en.avjoy.me/video/56019/supe...f-portrait-nat
![]()
Kyoto 206’s C girl line is nothing compared to what it used to be three years ago. I really missed Vava, Lolly, Olivia, Rosie etc.
Not a big fan of J girl, so can’t really comment on them
The video is awesome
My rating is usually only based on the face, but if we're talking about body as well, this girl would be 10/10 for me, especially for boob lovers.
She looked exactly like this, unfiltered & unedited.
Note: I didn't save this image, it's from their website.
![]()