Cassie @ Dreaming Heaven

[FredWard63]

Cassie, Thai. Pretty, shoulder length hair. Early 30s. Average height, great body - solid build, curvey, toned. Fantastic bum. D breasts, natural. Very good massage. Full menu with some limitations. Prices in the expected range. Very enthusiastic service. Likes to play. Cassie is pretty good, but the limitations interupted the flow.

[Phaser74]

Dear Frederick,

You know my viewpoint on your reviews.
Essentially you could say YMMV and leave it at that.

Let’s break it down.
Cassie, Thai - Public knowledge
Pretty, shoulder length hair. Early 30s. Average height, - This comment applies to 90% of mls at the shops you go to. Useless.
great body - solid build, curvey, toned. Fantastic bum. D breasts, natural. - Natural D Breasts on a thai would be highly unusual. Scars arent always obvious. The build information is helpful. Is it natural or work at the gym? Has she lost weight? Recovered from childbirth etc.
Very good massage. - Is this comment necessary from a thai masseuse?
Full menu with some limitations. - This is the most frustrating comment. What were the limitations? Did she not wash your socks? Did she not do light kissing? French Kissing? Anal? Not do an oil change on your car? Covered blow job? Words help.
Prices in the expected range. - Would more money have lifted the limitations? More rapport? Repeated visits? It’s not that hard to do a reasonable review. Not this abbreviated simpleton type review. You have fans, great. Hope it helps you sleep at night.
Very enthusiastic service. Likes to play. - Play scrabble? Teasing? Suck dick? Describe the enthusiasm? Is her personality bubbly, mischievous, sadistic etc?
Cassie is pretty good, but the limitations interupted the flow. - Again this limitations talk. Did she check her watch? Answer texts? This is about as vague as can be.

[Mortomata]

Hi Phaser, personally I have found Fred’s reviews to be excellent. His contributions are very valuable.

It sounds like you do not like his brief writing style and that’s fine but there’s really no need to take a shot at him. He is not getting compensated for sharing his opinion and it doesn’t need to cater for your preferences.

[massage-tragic]

Hi Phaser, personally I have found Fred’s reviews to be excellent. His contributions are very valuable.

It sounds like you do not like his brief writing style and that’s fine but there’s really no need to take a shot at him. He is not getting compensated for sharing his opinion and it doesn’t need to cater for your preferences.

I'm with you on this, as are probably the silent majority on here. The only thing I think Fred could have added this time is an indication of what the limitations might have been. I've commented previously that I personally like Fred's succinct style. Some on here seem to think they have to write an essay. More is not necessarily better. And they often include a lot of useless information.

[Kingpoo]

Jeez phaser. Everyone has their own writing style but how many reviews have you done in the past 6 months? It easy to criticise but at least show us how you do it so we can incorporate to our own

[it ain't me]

I did a modest review of her in April which might give u an idea of her speciality. DATY seems to be restricted for some reason. Also works at Bulimba i think.

[Phaser74]

Jeez phaser. Everyone has their own writing style but how many reviews have you done in the past 6 months? It easy to criticise but at least show us how you do it so we can incorporate to our own

I did 5 reviews in a short amount of time less than 8 months ago after a petulant fredward63 challenged me to do a review. I not only did one, I did 5. Mainly at shops he chooses not to go to. Maybe no retainer or discount for him elsewhere.

I never said my review should be the preferred style.
I also follow up with each and every question. Positive or Negative. Unlike most of these useless reviews which are hit and never return. It’s odd that the most replies he gets are people defending him when the format is called into question. Look how many threads have 0 replies?

I'm with you on this, as are probably the silent majority on here. The only thing I think Fred could have added this time is an indication of what the limitations might have been. I've commented previously that I personally like Fred's succinct style. Some on here seem to think they have to write an essay. More is not necessarily better. And they often include a lot of useless information.

An essay isn’t required. Basic information is. Even you who is defending the autistic style of his reviews, said it lacked information of what the limitations were. Think about that.
Isn’t more information, better than less? It’s then up to the reader to use what they want from the review.
I believe that people only key in on one part of his reviews - Full Menu or limited menu. The rest is window dressing for most. Full menu with limitations is a new one and why I posted

Hi Phaser, personally I have found Fred’s reviews to be excellent. His contributions are very valuable.

It sounds like you do not like his brief writing style and that’s fine but there’s really no need to take a shot at him. He is not getting compensated for sharing his opinion and it doesn’t need to cater for your preferences.

I do not like his brief writing style. It may as well just say ymmv.
I like an authors style or personality to come from their reviews.
Including Little details that often make or break a punt are chefs kiss.
The venue, the room, the suburb, the smell, the shower. All vital for a good punt.

I applaud fredward63 for putting himself out there and for criticism from the likes of me. I accept most like the simple review. Whether most of this forum is autistic is up for debate. From my detailed discussions with mls it isn’t. Posting the same style of review over and over again with no variety or flair illustrates that.
I love autistic people. They have perspectives that I do not. I respect that.
I’m not here to win friends. I get a lot of PMs from like minded punters who are much more aggressive in their tone and dont post because of the herd mentality demonstrated here. No one likes to stick out and be attacked. Except people like me. I post when i want, how i like and if it upsets people out of their comfort zones, mission accomplished.

I get a lot more from reviews where a little detail will make me want to see an ml. To each their own.

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Cassie, Thai. Pretty, shoulder length hair. Early 30s. Average height, great body - solid build, curvey, toned. Fantastic bum. D breasts, natural. Very good massage. Full menu with some limitations. Prices in the expected range. Very enthusiastic service. Likes to play. Cassie is pretty good, but the limitations interupted the flow.

Thanks for the review. I sometimes enjoy a nice massage as well as the extras. And often not looking for the full suite of extras so I’ll keep Cassie in mind for future.

[HST]

Phaser, saying he's autistic because of his review style, now that's just ridiculous. I like his reviews, he gives enough information to make a decision on whether to see the lady. I don't need to know everything, who wants to turn up somewhere knowing absolutely everything about the lady and her services? Some mystery is good.
You sound like the sort of person who's a nightmare to deal with, a restaurant diner who endlessly queries the wait staff on what's in this dish, what's in this one, where does the chef get his produce? Just wanting them to bow to your superior knowledge.

[Phaser74]

Phaser, saying he's autistic because of his review style, now that's just ridiculous. I like his reviews, he gives enough information to make a decision on whether to see the lady. I don't need to know everything, who wants to turn up somewhere knowing absolutely everything about the lady and her services? Some mystery is good.
You sound like the sort of person who's a nightmare to deal with, a restaurant diner who endlessly queries the wait staff on what's in this dish, what's in this one, where does the chef get his produce? Just wanting them to bow to your superior knowledge.

Its how he responded to criticism that was my red flag. But he is who he is. Good luck to him

And I agree about some mystery to a lady. I dont need to know her shoe and dress size, what town she was born in or her favourite TV show. An insight into her quirks is nice. Just a hint. Not the full description or psychoanalysis.

As for being a nightmare to deal with you couldn’t be further from the truth if you tried. I let professionals do their job unimpeded, or amateurs in the case of our lovely massage ladies.
I am respectful, courteous and pleasant company. Just yesterday a lovely lady booted her existing client out to see me.
If that is how some people behave in a restaurant and yes i’ve been seated with the type, i would be mortified. If spit is the only thing in their food, its a blessing.

On an anonymous messageboard, where I have been more frank than most with personal insights, p’s and q’s do not matter.

Back to the topic at hand, I would be mortified if half the reviews I did had zero, yes zero, replies.
Another 20% have one or two replies.
I would be encouraging comments, questions, eliciting feedback etc. Like I did with my 5 reviews.

If fred and the board is happy with that, what can i do? Is it too much to ask more more info and not less?

[L3xLuthor]

There’s a reason why he is called “Phaker”

[nametai]

Phaser - get over yourself. If you don't like Fred 's reviews or posts, just block him. Or, you know... just don't read them. Literally everyone in this thread has basically told you to get a reality check - you ain't the main character!

Fred - keep the posts coming.

[massage-tragic]

It’s odd that the most replies he gets are people defending him when the format is called into question. Look how many threads have 0 replies?

Has it ever occurred to you that people might be defending him because they believe he is being unfairly criticised by the likes of you? And has it also occurred to you that many of his threads might have 0 replies because he has given punters all the information they are wanting?