[QUOTE=ironmonk;4177677]

Lol bravo Ironmonk… I’m usually watching some av in the waiting room or seeing if I catch any girls walk up the stairs but this time round I’m in the waiting room seeing how ur webpage can be improved hahaha

Rough notes as I’m waiting for my sesh but I think the scores for face need some rework and recalibration to factor in personal preferences…

Current faces Scores are skewed if looking at raw number only … I definitely don’t agree with some of the rankings and vice versa some may not agree with mine …

Some may rate higher based on personal preferences eg cute vs pretty vs glamour type vs beautiful vs cosmetic pretty vs natural pretty minimal makeup etc

Work around change score metric to one of the above based on what most have rated it as or intially based on picking off the key words in her profile eg some girls profile have very pretty super cute glamour type etc take out the buzz words describing her looks from her profile (if this can be automated)

And then as others see the girl or she has an AR supplement the rating with punters voting which photo is most accurate for the girl I was thinking the photo/s that most accurate for the girl gets a green thumbs up with a count based on polls/verification by other punters

That way if a girl rated as say pretty score of 9 and 12 other punters also vouched the accuracy on a particular photo and she looks very pretty in that punter verified photo than high chances she’s universally pretty?

I dunno that’s me thinking out loud but I’m also distracted/hypnotized by the scent of goat milk hahahaha