The template on PP was designed that way due to guys not able to tell the differences in one size to the next. So making it say, 6-8, would reduce arguments within a review. Even with this range, guys still suggest a different size to what's in the template. So it's actually very common for guys not to be able to estimate a girl's size.
Also, if the reviewer thinks the girl is smaller than size 6-8, they simply state it in the written review. I've even explained in some of my reviews there, why I choose 6-8 over 8-10. In Nina's case, she'd be closer to size 8.
Maybe you should do a review yourself. Better yet, actually go see a girl rather than read other's comments (a lot being full of shit) and passing them off as your own. Just like a couple of other members here.
I'd suggest that you cannot have confidence in the views of a number of members here - example being the member above (who used to be Hero69). Now,, even a broken clock is correct twice a day, so there maybe some posts are correct. But which ones can you rely on? The above member has admitted on another thread that he posted a lie that a ML had a STD as he didn't want other guys seeing her. This speaks to his motives. Here is his quote from the 29/7/26:
https://www.aus99forum.com/showthrea...30#post4219630
The pics used by this shop are not of the girl. The girls I've seen, are mostly similar to the girl though. I haven't seen every girl there however.
The majority of shops employ this practice. So this gives you an opportunity to walk if you aren't happy with the girl. I know, it's a pain to get to the shop and have to do that. As I said, it's the same with most shops though.












Reply With Quote




