Reply With QuoteThe ages ARE correct; they're just given in hex.
|
I have been to a few different places now in Sydney and the age of the girl is never correct with what is advertised. The photos have all been the correct girl (from what I can tell) but taken many years ago. Not to say that I haven't still enjoyed myself though with the session that followed though. But it would be nice to see the girl as per the listing. Thank you for your advice.
The ages ARE correct; they're just given in hex.
What does that even mean, in my head i just imagine when the descriptions mentions age, they are on the younger side. And when its left out they are older 🤷*♂️Originally Posted by 11Bravo
For the liberal arts majors, I was referring to numerical bases. Breadth requirements really are helpful in life.
Short answer......none
hahaha legend!
Age is rarely correct. If says 20 add an extra 10 years. Some shops the photos are accurate, but not many.
Lol. They're all advertised as 20, just add 10 years and you'll be closer to the mark. Occasionally you might get one truly in their early 20's especially if Jap.
photos at 408 amora are always real
potts point 48 kellet seems to use real photos as well
The ages are given how the particular lady or ladyboy identifies as
I've always added 5-10 years to any photos I see.
Ginza photos are fairly accurate, ages aren't too far off (probably closer than most shops in any case) and generally only vary a lot because profiles generally don't get updated once they're made.
I'll second Amora photos being real as well. Ages aren't too egregious either.
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|
|