I Used AI to Analyse Hundreds of Aus99 Reviews - 90 Shortlisted Girls, 16 Shops, 2 Tiers

[edging]

G'day guys..

I'm a bit of an AI geek. I use agentic AI and automation extensively for work, so today I thought I'd put it to a completely different use.

What if I could get AI to scan hundreds of AUS99 reviews, compare everyone's experiences, filter out the noise and produce a shortlist of the most consistently recommended WLs/MLs?

So that's what I've been doing.

I went through multiple shop categories, individual threads, replies and repeat experiences. Then I combined the findings with my own firsthand experiences and a few names on my wishlist.

The result: 90 entries across 16 Sydney shop/location groups, split into two tiers.


HOW I FILTERED THE REVIEWS

I didn't simply ask my AI, "Who's the best?"

I used three weighted factors:

• 50% .. Natural chemistry and intimacy: Friendly, naughty playfulness, good conversation, laughter, teasing, genuine warmth and personality. Not robotic or mechanical.
• 25% .. Attentiveness and effort: Engaged throughout, makes you comfortable, doesn't unnecessarily rush or clock-watch.
• 25% .. Review consistency: Positive experiences from different members, repeat visits and how consistently the feedback holds up.

Additional filters:

• Prioritised roughly the last 15 months of reviews. Older reports were considered as supporting evidence where useful.
• Predominantly negative review histories were excluded.
• Mixed reviews were considered only where the overall evidence remained strongly positive.
• Looked for independent reviewers rather than counting multiple posts from the same person.
• Discounted shop promotions, obvious hype and questionable review credibility.
• Checked negative experiences, potential name changes and movement between shops.
• Technical massage skills were NOT part of my scoring.

I've deliberately limited the research to shops I've visited, can realistically travel to, or would consider visiting.


UNDERSTANDING THE TWO TIERS

Tier 1 .. Strongest Positive Reviews
My highest-confidence shortlist. The intended benchmark was approximately 95-100% positive feedback, with particularly strong evidence of personality, attentiveness and consistency.

Tier 2 .. Mostly Positive / Promising
The broader benchmark was 80%+ positive feedback. These names may have fewer reviews, older evidence or occasional mixed experiences.

Important: These percentages are indicative confidence bands, not mathematically verified scores for every individual.
Tier 2 does NOT mean bad. It simply means the available evidence isn't as strong or consistent as Tier 1.


TOP 90 .. THE ULTIMATE SYDNEY SHOP-BY-SHOP SHORTLIST

1. 227 NORTH STRATHFIELD MASSAGE
Tier 1: Ester, Mellisa, Soda
Tier 2: Freya, Gina, Kara, Layla


2. 192 RYDE / 252 STANMORE / 42 CROWN / 69 SAVANN - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: Jasmine, Anna, Nadia, Lucia, Pia, Mimi, Soda
Tier 2: Demi, Julie, Meena, Pink / Pinky


3. 107 CHILL
Tier 1: Angela, Aggie
Tier 2: Amber, Ella, Kim, Nadia, Siena


4. 14 CONCORD MASSAGE
Tier 1: Evelyn, Rani
Tier 2: Isabella, Linda, Sonya, Trixie


5. 331 CONCORD MASSAGE
Tier 1: -
Tier 2: Lia, Quinn, Sky, Susie


6. 408 AMORA MERRYLANDS
Tier 1: Hannah, Linda, Nadia, Soda, Zoey
Tier 2: Jasmine, Kendall, Kimberly, Kylie


7. 42 GLADESVILLE
Tier 1: Harumi, Jay, Joa
Tier 2: -


8. DREAM GIRL 130 / DREAM GIRL 115 - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: -
Tier 2: Aggie, Nina, Skye


9. LE SOLEIL MASSAGE, CROYDON
Tier 1: Erica, Patty, Soda
Tier 2: Summer


10. MIRAGE 108 / PLATINUM 121 - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: Miko, Chase, Kaho, Maria
Tier 2: Karu, Mia, Rami


11. NO. 5 MARRICKVILLE (N5M)
Tier 1: Cindy, Hanna, Hazel, Jay, Leah, Mia, Naomi, Paula
Tier 2: -


12. PARRAMATTA BLOSSOM MASSAGE
Tier 1: Apple, Ching Ching, Liya, Milin, Sabrina
Tier 2: Ivy, Maggie, Mona, Soki


13. SUMMERVILLE MASSAGE, PYRMONT
Tier 1: Ice, Momo, Pen
Tier 2: Canny, Nicole


14. SYDNEY BABY MASSAGE
Tier 1: Milin, Monica
Tier 2: -


15. SYDNEY GIRL MASSAGE
Tier 1: Eva, Maggie
Tier 2: -


16. VELVET ROSE
Tier 1: Giana, Selina
Tier 2: Winona, Yumiko, Rani


HOW TO FIND THE ORIGINAL AUS99 REVIEWS

This shortlist is based on AUS99 forum discussions and reviews.

Every name was drawn from this forum material written by members (one of you), alongside my own personal experience where applicable.

Simply search Google: WL/ML name + Shop name + AUS99

You'll generally find the relevant AUS99 discussions, and for many names, multiple firsthand reviews written by different members (one of you).

Read those individual experiences and judge for yourself.

This is a consolidated shortlist, not a replacement for reading the original reviews.


MY OWN EXPERIENCES vs. AI RESEARCH

Just to clarify, this isn't entirely AI-generated opinion.

I've combined four things:

• My own firsthand experiences with ladies I've personally visited.
• Other AUS99 members' experiences shared on the forum.
• My wishlist of ladies I haven't visited but whose reviews caught my attention.
• Most importantly, AI-powered filters, factors and considerations applied using the weighted criteria explained at the beginning of this post.

So please don't assume I've personally visited everyone listed!


FINAL THOUGHTS

AUS99 is full of useful information, but it's scattered across hundreds of threads.
One reviewer loves someone, another has a different experience, and a third mentions she worked somewhere else under another name.
That's exactly the sort of messy information AI is useful for organising.

I thought I'd share the result rather than keep it to myself. Hopefully it's useful to a few of you.

And I'd genuinely appreciate some feedback:

• Who on the Tier 1 list do you strongly agree or disagree with?
• Who from Tier 2 deserves to be upgraded?
• Have I missed anyone with consistently excellent reviews?

Firsthand experiences only, ideally. That's what makes this forum valuable.

cheers guys!

[jaquedm1307]

Firstly hats off for the effort and time you've put in for the forum and its member - great appreciated
It's a field I'm lost in :-) - used (the latest high tech editor) to write reports on an Amstrad with <B> text </B> etc

A few (personal) observations to start the ball rolling

1. Soda
appears on 3 x Tier 1's - certainly a few years ago she was 100% up there - had it all & offered it all with total passion naughtiness amd a smile but became jaded lately

2. Freya / Summer (regular)
Should be elevated to Tier 1 - has and still delivers the full Monty - incredible genuine massage and extras ? Well you'd be hard pressed to find better though her BBBJ can be a bit toothy at times but we're working on that one
& yes I've helped her on this forum so acknowledge that a favourite over 4 years now and still a regular and every time I see her she's does something different or new & continually asks what's other girls do I like so she can learn - dedicated to the profession and always wanting to improve

3. 192 Ryde etc 'Ada's shops
I'll leave this for others to comment on girls !
Another personal bug bare of mine as believe massive % of theses AR's are not of 'genuine sessions' / fake used to simply promote the shops - would be interested in you doing an AI review on Ada's shops of ARs that have been written from profiles
a) that have < 10 & < 20 posts prior to the review
B) that do not mention details ie $ amts and specific extras - generalised drivel

4. Sonya 14 Concord (Friday) should be Tier 1.5 :-)
Been MIA for a while but OMG she's like a dusky & slimmer version of Soda on Red Bull great body, incredible breasts, variable intensity to suit the mood and a passion that literally vacuums you empty. Delight from start to finish and will give you 150% for the whole session

Anyway once again thanks for all your efforts

[MrPB]

Hey mate, good stuff.

Results seem thereabouts to who this forum enjoys.

Question - what AI model did you use?

[Wayne]

Interesting, thank you edging. Surprised that Ginza doesn’t appear. A purely subjective perusal of this forum suggests Wilson’s girls are highly considered.

[Wank_Somemore]

Thanks for the effort!

Sadly some of the Tier 1 & 2 girls might not be in the industry anymore as I haven't seen their names on the roster.

eg. Harumi at 42, Ice/Canny at Summerville

[yunglean]

Would be good to turn this into a dashboard where we cn change weightings and criteria. Part 1 is important to me, for example.

Agree with 192 Ryde/Ada's shops needing to be exempted. They have a high volume of fake reviews. I have had great punts there but your model would need to denoise the reviews significantly

[Icegodofhungary]

Interesting, thank you edging. Surprised that Ginza doesn’t appear. A purely subjective perusal of this forum suggests Wilson’s girls are highly considered.

The OP states that he limited this review to shops he’s visited, realistically can travel to, or would consider visiting. Perhaps Ginza doesn’t fit this criteria for him. With a few noticeable exceptions a lot of the places are massage / rnt joints rather than full service brothels.

[Icegodofhungary]

Thanks for this OP.

Did your AI analysis consider only ‘AR’ posts or were you also scouring general discussion and other threads for discussion on girls?

Can your AI model easily distinguish between different girls with the same name?

Also, wondering how much your personal experiences and wish list influenced the outcome as opposed to the pure AI analysis of posts here?

[firekombi]

Amazing effort.

And the posts in the AR section around 3am, what?

I wish our shops overlap more, but they dont. Shame.

[Linza Giz]

Ai sucks bro. The machines will soon rise and they don't care about who gives a better gobby