Hayne should've posted a review in the private section. Would've saved all this conjecture. At least we'd know what really happened. Everybody knows a punters word is gospel.... isn't it?
Printable View
Hayne should've posted a review in the private section. Would've saved all this conjecture. At least we'd know what really happened. Everybody knows a punters word is gospel.... isn't it?
Oof, ok, I’ll eat that humble pie. I deserve it for not fact checking before posting.
Still doesn’t change my feelings about the trial. When what really happened cannot be proven beyond a doubt, then you would have to consider the facts surrounding the occurrence. The lead up to the encounter. Those facts do not paint a picture of a rape.
If the facts leading up to the encounter do not mean shit and it’s always going to default to simply what she said happened, well then all I can say is may God help the next generation of men trying to have any sort of sexual relationship in this country.
All good bro, the fact is a lot of punters and sugar daddies are oblivious to the recent changes in sexual consent laws. Brothels (in most cases) would be a sure bet, all other arrangements eg pubs, clubs, sugar baby arrangements, masssge parlours etc you are skating on thin ice if the chick gets cold feet at the eleventh hour.
https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/public...t_consent.html
I’m infinitely more concerned about the thirteenth hour, bro. Even when a girl decides not to go ahead at the very cusp of the act, a proper man would still have a chance of acquiescing with the girl’s wishes. He gets the message, if he presses on he’s done. All fair and square.
But what if a girl gets buyer’s remorse and alleges rape after the act? I’ve been with girls a lot and I know how far a scorned woman’s ego could go to get even. It’s not a joke, it will happen if they know that they have a good chance of pulling it off.
Ok....let's take this scenario. A WL in an intro clearly states no anal after the punter asks if it is something she does. The punter picks her anyway and then while she's on all fours pegs her in her arsehole without her consent. Is this considered sexual assault?
[QUOTE=GoldfishMan;2643811]I’m infinitely more concerned about the thirteenth hour, bro. Even when a girl decides not to go ahead at the very cusp of the act, a proper man would still have a chance of acquiescing with the girl’s wishes. He gets the message, if he presses on he’s done. All fair and square.
But what if a girl gets buyer’s remorse and alleges rape after the act? I’ve been with girls a lot and I know how far a scorned woman’s ego could go to get even. It’s not a joke, it will happen if they know that they have a good chance of pulling it off.[/QUOTE]
I reckon that it was the case in the Brittany Higgins situation. I think that even if you are chock-a-block up a girl and been pounding away for 5 or ten minutes, and she is completely happy with it, if she changes her mind and says stop then it is considered rape
You nailed it Wally. It was all over not having a condom
It is obvious that most who are making a comment here have ever been on a jury
The accused is presumed innocent from the start.
The jurors are selected randomly, and the accused has a say on the final 12.
The crown has to prove beyond reasonable doubt the accused
a) had sexual intercourse with the other party
b) did it without the other party's consent
c) knew the other party did not consent.
FIV, DATY, Eating ass, blow job etc is deemed as sexual intercourse in a court of law.
It is the Jury's responsibility to deliver a verdict (ie guilty or not guilty)
The judge summarises and adjudicates the punishment based on the verdict and common law.
Anyway after all the comments including mine and a few from the forum "experts on every thread posted", the grub will be sentenced soon and you can all forget about it.........