Reply With QuoteBooking purely based on photo is pretty much the same as booking blind these days...
I book based on ARs, or go see a lineup.
I recently took a punt at a new (to me) shop - the shop is a little dingy from the outer for sure, and quite close to home, so had never been there. At my main shop a booking fell through, so I called shop B on a whim. There was one girl avail to meet.... ok....Originally Posted by Ghost2hauntU
She's young - not immediately attractive, seemed very quiet, a little acne - she only had on a towel, so I couldn't really see much, only that her boobs were obviously above average.
Not my type from appearances was my initial impression.
But I booked her - and she was awesome... I felt like I'd picked up a friendly jillaroo at a B&S.... I've been back since, and booked for next week. Don't judge too hastily.....
Booking purely based on photo is pretty much the same as booking blind these days...
I book based on ARs, or go see a lineup.
This depends of course on the shop.... so far I've found the photos and descriptions up here to be a reasonable guide. No extreme age differences etc...
If a shop normally posts photos of their girls and all of a sudden has 1 or 2 new girls popup that do not have photos, that's a huge red flag. Best avoid those girls.
How annoying are the "100% real photo" claims shop adds to the descriptions of a pic? Technically true because the model in the pic is real. However, it's misleading and clearly fraudulent because the ML/WL in reality is NOT the same person. Even with face blurred/hidden you can tell it's a fake. Many shops deploy this practice and the same pic/description is recycled around. Shops are treating punters with no respect. Alternatively, shops should claim that the pic is a close representation. Sorry, just wanted to get it off my chest for today.
What does irritate me is that despite all of us carrying around high-def cameras in our pockets, so many of the pics look to have been shot by an old Nokia!
User that to your advantage bro. It tells you how old the photos are and therefore, what you're actually gonna get in the booking.
Funny story - one of the crappiest pics (for pic quality) had an absolute stunner hiding behind it..... another girl up here has awesome profile pics, one especially, but the girl is even better.... either the pics aren't of her, or are pretty old, and she has gained a few kg (can't be too old - she's only c.21-22 as it is)... its definitely punting!
Bloody good point there! Most WLs do not carry old phones too - mostly using I-phone 11 or newer. Obviously advantageous to them using old pics . They were in their prime then.
Is there a thread anywhere that names the shops that are notorious for using fake photos? Would be interesting.
Exactly this! Except there are occasions when you just want to bang a young youthful girl purely for the looks. In these cases, I moderate my expectations of the service I receive and so am not disappointed.
IMHO it'd be a very long list... Most of the shops will come in that category 😁 Probably shops that post only real photos will be short and easy to track.
Really? I’m actually surprised by that. I get that some photoshopping goes on but to use totally fake photos would surely be detrimental to the shop in the long run. Maybe I’m naive lol.
I've yet to come across a shop that uses 100% real photos (no PS, no filter) for EVERY single girl, most of them have some form of photoshop (some worse than others), and don't get me started on the complete fake ones, also sometimes a shop may use a mix of fake/real photos for the girl i.e. one of them may be real, they'll chuck in two fake ones as well just for the mix, even the well known top tier shops. I only visit Asian shops.
The WLS that I have seen @ 187 Hornsby uses real photos. That's probably the only FS shop I have come across on the Northern side . There are probably more MPs where the major of the ML pics from that shop are genuine. MPs like 227 NSM and 41 Epping.
Yeah brah I concur. As we both know, 647 Waterloo WLs photos are almost all real and unedited, except for the width sometimes to make the girls look taller and slimmer. Otherwise that is perhaps the only shop I can think of atm that’s kept it real for many years.
yup 647 is one of the more "realistic" ones, authentic and old school, very minimal photoshop, you can tell the photos are not that glamorous lol.
Bro there are plenty of RNT shops that photoshop the girls, even some of the popular ones, including 227 NSM and 41 Epping, they may not do it for all the girls but trust me they are being done.
Yup. I do not doubt you about the RNT shops. Luckily for me the ones I saw used genuine pics. Some pics of really good looking MLs @ 2 Pope St Top Ryde . Open minded services too. Be worth a visit.
the idea of unpredictability, that you never know what you're getting. just like a box of chocolates!
+1... its a thrill....
Yesterday - my tentative booking with a known stunner didn't pan out.... my new regular had a day off.... would I punt, or save the cash? I'll punt! Who's on at my local?? New girl to me.... DD boobs is all I know, apparently 'young'. I'm going in! Met her.... yep, big boobs (she was only in panties), a little plump, plain face, bad wig, too many tatts for me.... would I stay? OK - I've come this far!
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|