All your winning money is sitting very safely in your betting account, in fact, I doubt you ever even see your money, it's free flowing between your bank account and your betting account.........hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Travelmate
Cheers
Printable View
All your winning money is sitting very safely in your betting account, in fact, I doubt you ever even see your money, it's free flowing between your bank account and your betting account.........hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Travelmate
Cheers
Oh that post?Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactus
My point is..
I guess it's only you who don't understand.lol.
Heaps of smartass everywhere huh..
The world is changing.
Oh, yeah yeah.Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactus
That's right.
Okay. You are right.
Whoa, you're really smart.
Go for it brother.
Hey guys, i lose to Galactus!
So, is this enough to stop everything?
I don't want too much verbal warfare.
It's up to the reader to judge bro.
Call me hypocrite if you/anyone want. :smile:
But those girls. Know who am I. :cool2:
And they are heaps. And they read the forum. And they know my username.
Just don't let them know you are Galactus. Just imagine someone accusing them to start work because drugs addiction book them for a session.
Ain't pretty.
Hi guys,
I think it's time to cool off before some one may say some regretable stuff which may resulted in someone getting banned from the forum and that ain't cool.
Let's not forget the brother who started this thread has come to his own terms and since long gone and silenced.
Why bother any more.
Let's spend some of you precious energy on where and who and when is your next punt, whether you TRUST that WL or not.
Have a nice evening,
Cheers
ps. Need any massage tips ??
Its nothing to do with having a low opinion of a working lady, when you go out you lock your house does that mean you have a low opinion of your neighbours? Dont think so it just pays to be safe and sensible and not tempt fate.Quote:
Originally Posted by moonlighter
Its exactly the same with a wl.
Its the same if you have tradesmen or cleaners etc in your house you don't leave valuable lying around, if they happen to get miss placed you end up blaming them and then find that you put it in a different spot or something. Its just common sense dont put yourself or anyone else in what could become an uncomfortable position its so unnecessary.
90% or maybe more people are honest its the small% that arn't thats the problem and wl are no different than the rest of the comunity in this regard. I have heard of working ladies steeling from their work mates same as I have had tradesmen steel from their work mates so best for everyone to not tempt fate.
An excellent summary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhd
He was saying that, because bro Galactus posted something about WLs in general. Some people (including bro moonlight) thought that it was somewhat-significantly-more-than-normal negative, which I described as prejudice. However, bro galactus rebutted that description and said that he has no prejudice against anyone. He'd later sophisticatedly describe those somewhat-significantly-more-than-normal negative expressions as an ... "assumptions".
Given the fact bro Galactus potentially likes to punt (well he join this forum, so he likes to punt doesn't he?), to some people, including bro Moonlight, it sounds quite contradictory to the point of hypocrisy.
Hope that explains.
Sorry, just got nothing to do at home.:smile:
Ah, don't forget this one, the most important part:
I 'admitted' that I lose to bro Galactus.
:smile:
I read this post with mixed feelings, this is my story down to a tee!!! I have come to the conclusion that females are hard wired totally different to males, which is why we will never understand their feelings or their behavior. Hence, non of them should be trusted. Brother KickAss, wishing your buddy good luck. Have you introduced him to this forum???Quote:
Originally Posted by kickass
Hahah amusing thread. Its funny to see the fan boys all up in arms over a few words said on internet.
Yeah, I'm a loser who always change my words.
I believe everyone is smart enough to know everything and read and understand.
You know it. :smile:
Oh of course, it was meant to protect my friends.Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactus
Except that without these words, they've liked me and take me as their friends. Why? Dunno why. Guess why?
And I've virtually withdrawn from Sydney punting world. So these posts would have little/no positive effect for me.
If she's smokin hot, young, a bubble of energy and she treats your 'member' like a billion dollar bill - just carry on with the punt and don't get too wrapped up emotionally.
What a great read this was boys, i need some damn sleep !
Wow!!
Nearly 3 pages on this thread and we ALL knew nothing of Bro Altgourami's initial angst until #95.
Yet forum members were able to create the remainder of the posts from speculation and personal stories. Are we all frustrated authors??
You are not wrong there brother C&B, everyone is ready and willing to expose or explode, just waiting for the right topic to appear or the wrong button to be pushed.......lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr Crash and Burn
I am just a kid at heart......haha
Cheers
Basically Altgourami's post was like an exam question:
"Never trust a working girl."
Discuss.
And so we did. He may not have planned it that way, but that was the inevitable result.
Sextus,
Thanks for your compliments mate. It was a fun write. I've emailed it to my mates too.
You know what, our lengthy discussion has made me thinking twice about refering to english dictionaries for the definitions of "assumptions" and "prejudices".
This is one small step for a punter, and a major leap back for mankind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jj999
In my case, my assumptions are only to see the good in people as my starting point. (Mind you, I don't work in a drug rehabilitation halfway house either, so I'm not dumb or dogmatic about it.)
So these qualities you mention can work for mankind too. It just depends on where you start from.
If you get burnt by being trusting every ten, twenty or thirty years - big deal. You're still way in front in terms of your own serenity.
I'm just not a suspicious type. So I'd never be a copper. They have to spend their entire life in a state of suspicion. Amongst other reasons, it is why their social circle is largely restricted to other coppers. Average citizens feel a little unconsciously guilty in their presence - even when they aren't. They feel they have to be careful with their words. The poor coppers pick up on this, so they have to hang out with each other in social situations to feel fully comfortable themselves. On a smaller scale, they represent what the two groupings in this debate on the trust and not trust divide represent.
Overall, this trust issue is a philosopical debate that will never be won or concluded. All we can do is put our own two cents in (as AhLungor is so fond of saying) and hope what we say means something to others too.
But as I said above, the thread brought up trust as the central issue. As that affects us all, there was always going to be a lot of passion in the debate. Sometimes that leads to things becoming too personal between people, but it isn't the first time that has happened, or the last time it will happen on this forum.
Although that is unfortunate, someone always chimes in with a "calm down" message.
Welcome to the Aus99 University:
Current lecture:
Social Psychology 101
Enjoy
Cheers
Some people get offended easily and arent mature enough to let bygones be bygones is all i learnt from this topic.
That is true Galactus, and as I already said above, I'm not dogmatic.
And I hope I have sense, both the common variety and even strive for a touch of the not so common variety too.
cheers mate.
Dogmatic ?
That's exactly what he's been doing, trying to impose his opinion about WLs on others, in fact, in all his previous life as Charlie123, Charlie456, Charlie789, his only interest in the forum is being dogmatic and creating arguments!
I hope you are going to come up with new definition of "dogmatic".. As you've been with "prejudice" and "assumption".
This is very thrilling!
Is it going to be a major leap (back) for the academic world?
Or a major revelation of a hypocrite by means of tangled by his own words?
Or an idiotic vandaliser trying to impose a dogma, in a way that it looks really intellectual with statistics only to be rubbished with the fact that he only taking bits by bits from a valid sounding documents?
Or just simply an ignorant person with nothing to do at home except trying to impose dogma?
Or revelation of an old loser who has been rubbished few times, and banned for good, but throwing away his manhood only to try his chance for revenge?
Or is it going to be combination of all?
Man, this is very thrilling! I nearly wet my pants!
Sorry for the slight hyperbole. But,
Galactus sir, as I've said, reading your post feels like reading a detective book, or mystery book, or sometimes simply a comical picture book with a donkey and an ogre running and jumping around.
Following definitions were copied from merriam-webster.
Main Entry: dog·mat·ic
Pronunciation: \dȯg-ˈma-tik, däg-\
Variant(s): also dog·mat·i·cal \-ti-kəl\
Function: adjective
Date: 1660
1 : characterized by or given to the expression of opinions very strongly or positively as if they were facts <a dogmatic critic>
2 : of or relating to dogma
synonyms see dictatorial
— dog·mat·i·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
— dog·mat·i·cal·ness \-ti-kəl-nəs\ noun
Main Entry: 1prej·u·dice
Pronunciation: \ˈpre-jə-dəs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin praejudicium previous judgment, damage, from prae- + judicium judgment — more at judicial
Date: 13th century
1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics
synonyms see predilection
Main Entry: as·sump·tion
Pronunciation: \ə-ˈsəm(p)-shən\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin assumption-, assumptio taking up, from Latin assumere
Date: 13th century
1 a : the taking up of a person into heaven b capitalized : August 15 observed in commemoration of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary
2 : a taking to or upon oneself <the assumption of a new position>
3 : the act of laying claim to or taking possession of something <the assumption of power>
4 : arrogance, pretension
5 a : an assuming that something is true b : a fact or statement (as a proposition, axiom, postulate, or notion) taken for granted
6 : the taking over of another's debts
It's more of language class actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by AHLUNGOR
How far particular word can bend and twist.
So far we have demonstrated that "assumption" and "prejudice" are both showing similar properties of able to be bended and twisted.
And Galactus bro has introduced new definitions for those words which practically rubbished high credibility english dictionaries.
He still need to show the new of definition those two though,
But he directed current attention, on the possibilities of bend & twist, and make a new definition of "dogmatic".
I just read this thread again, my question is Guys , Where are we now ?