Never trust a working girl

[altgourami]

An excellent summary.

cuimd2, what else do you need to know?

Basically altgourami must have been dating a hot chick who was a WL or ML aged around 24, she dumped him for another young guy who is clearly poorer than him.
He misses her, but now he knows he probably dodged a bullet there, and doesnt want to talk too much about it,
since its his private life.

Altgourami, we pay whores to go away from us, not pay to fuck them... so hope you feel better soon, and dont let a bitch effect your feelings..cheers

[Jj999]

He was saying that, because bro Galactus posted something about WLs in general. Some people (including bro moonlight) thought that it was somewhat-significantly-more-than-normal negative, which I described as prejudice. However, bro galactus rebutted that description and said that he has no prejudice against anyone. He'd later sophisticatedly describe those somewhat-significantly-more-than-normal negative expressions as an ... "assumptions".

Given the fact bro Galactus potentially likes to punt (well he join this forum, so he likes to punt doesn't he?), to some people, including bro Moonlight, it sounds quite contradictory to the point of hypocrisy.

Hope that explains.

Sorry, just got nothing to do at home.

Ah, don't forget this one, the most important part:
I 'admitted' that I lose to bro Galactus.

[Eff2fifty]

I read this post with mixed feelings, this is my story down to a tee!!! I have come to the conclusion that females are hard wired totally different to males, which is why we will never understand their feelings or their behavior. Hence, non of them should be trusted. Brother KickAss, wishing your buddy good luck. Have you introduced him to this forum???

They don't call them "cunts" for nothing !!!

ANY girl can scam you or break your heart. Recently, a mate of mine was *told* on a Saturday morning by his *wife* of 12 years, "I never loved you. I don't know why I married you. You're boring. I'm leaving. You can keep the kids with you."

Her timing was impeccable ... it was on Saturday, the day before Father's Day. He has four kids, all under 10. It was all he could do to call his mum and me. When I arrived he was a bawling mess in the living room with his kids. The bitch had left, apparently to shack up with another man that she had met at a Light Opera Company she had joined.

Now, my friend is a great guy. He works full time, picks kids up from swimming, tennis, or cubs on the way home from work, does all the laundry and the yard at home. He finds time for Nippers on Sunday morning with his son, to build a dolls house for one daughter and a cubby house for another. The list goes on. Of course he's fuckin' boring ... that's what happens when you have kids!!!

He married his childhood sweetheart and spoiled her constantly. I do baby sitting duty 2-3 times every year and his parents also do a few shifts while he took his wife to dinner. On wedding anniversaries he'd make a night of it, booking a hotel in town or having a short break to Melbourne or the Blue Mountains. Fuck, I'd almost marry the guy myself!

... and the bitch said she never even loved him ...

Dude, it can happen to any of us. Just learn to pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and find another girl. The world is fuckin' full of nice girls.

[handbanana]

Hahah amusing thread. Its funny to see the fan boys all up in arms over a few words said on internet.

[Jj999]

Yeah, I'm a loser who always change my words.

I believe everyone is smart enough to know everything and read and understand.
You know it.

[Jj999]

Hypocrite - why??

From your earlier post JJ999 I can see the only reason you take the positions that you do, is to ingratiate yourself with the prostutes you visit. LOL. You sad little man, that is utterly pathetic

Oh of course, it was meant to protect my friends.
Except that without these words, they've liked me and take me as their friends. Why? Dunno why. Guess why?
And I've virtually withdrawn from Sydney punting world. So these posts would have little/no positive effect for me.

[Revvedup]

If she's smokin hot, young, a bubble of energy and she treats your 'member' like a billion dollar bill - just carry on with the punt and don't get too wrapped up emotionally.
What a great read this was boys, i need some damn sleep !

[Mr Crash and Burn]

Wow!!

Nearly 3 pages on this thread and we ALL knew nothing of Bro Altgourami's initial angst until #95.

Yet forum members were able to create the remainder of the posts from speculation and personal stories. Are we all frustrated authors??

[AHLUNGOR]

Wow!!

Nearly 3 pages on this thread and we ALL knew nothing of Bro Altgourami's initial angst until #95.

Yet forum members were able to create the remainder of the posts from speculation and personal stories. Are we all frustrated authors??

You are not wrong there brother C&B, everyone is ready and willing to expose or explode, just waiting for the right topic to appear or the wrong button to be pushed.......lol

I am just a kid at heart......haha

Cheers

[Sextus]

Basically Altgourami's post was like an exam question:

"Never trust a working girl."

Discuss.

And so we did. He may not have planned it that way, but that was the inevitable result.

[kickass]

Sextus,

Thanks for your compliments mate. It was a fun write. I've emailed it to my mates too.

[Jj999]

You know what, our lengthy discussion has made me thinking twice about refering to english dictionaries for the definitions of "assumptions" and "prejudices".

This is one small step for a punter, and a major leap back for mankind.

[Sextus]

You know what, our lengthy discussion has made me thinking twice about refering to english dictionaries for the definitions of "assumptions" and "prejudices".

This is one small step for a punter, and a major leap back for mankind.

In my case, my assumptions are only to see the good in people as my starting point. (Mind you, I don't work in a drug rehabilitation halfway house either, so I'm not dumb or dogmatic about it.)

So these qualities you mention can work for mankind too. It just depends on where you start from.

If you get burnt by being trusting every ten, twenty or thirty years - big deal. You're still way in front in terms of your own serenity.

I'm just not a suspicious type. So I'd never be a copper. They have to spend their entire life in a state of suspicion. Amongst other reasons, it is why their social circle is largely restricted to other coppers. Average citizens feel a little unconsciously guilty in their presence - even when they aren't. They feel they have to be careful with their words. The poor coppers pick up on this, so they have to hang out with each other in social situations to feel fully comfortable themselves. On a smaller scale, they represent what the two groupings in this debate on the trust and not trust divide represent.

Overall, this trust issue is a philosopical debate that will never be won or concluded. All we can do is put our own two cents in (as AhLungor is so fond of saying) and hope what we say means something to others too.

But as I said above, the thread brought up trust as the central issue. As that affects us all, there was always going to be a lot of passion in the debate. Sometimes that leads to things becoming too personal between people, but it isn't the first time that has happened, or the last time it will happen on this forum.

Although that is unfortunate, someone always chimes in with a "calm down" message.

[AHLUNGOR]

Welcome to the Aus99 University:

Current lecture:

Social Psychology 101

Enjoy

Cheers

[handbanana]

Some people get offended easily and arent mature enough to let bygones be bygones is all i learnt from this topic.

[Sextus]

That is true Galactus, and as I already said above, I'm not dogmatic.

And I hope I have sense, both the common variety and even strive for a touch of the not so common variety too.

cheers mate.

[Jj999]

Dogmatic ?
That's exactly what he's been doing, trying to impose his opinion about WLs on others, in fact, in all his previous life as Charlie123, Charlie456, Charlie789, his only interest in the forum is being dogmatic and creating arguments!

[Jj999]

I hope you are going to come up with new definition of "dogmatic".. As you've been with "prejudice" and "assumption".
This is very thrilling!

Is it going to be a major leap (back) for the academic world?
Or a major revelation of a hypocrite by means of tangled by his own words?
Or an idiotic vandaliser trying to impose a dogma, in a way that it looks really intellectual with statistics only to be rubbished with the fact that he only taking bits by bits from a valid sounding documents?
Or just simply an ignorant person with nothing to do at home except trying to impose dogma?
Or revelation of an old loser who has been rubbished few times, and banned for good, but throwing away his manhood only to try his chance for revenge?
Or is it going to be combination of all?

Man, this is very thrilling! I nearly wet my pants!
Sorry for the slight hyperbole. But,

Galactus sir, as I've said, reading your post feels like reading a detective book, or mystery book, or sometimes simply a comical picture book with a donkey and an ogre running and jumping around.




Following definitions were copied from merriam-webster.

Main Entry: dog·mat·ic
Pronunciation: \dȯg-ˈma-tik, däg-\
Variant(s): also dog·mat·i·cal \-ti-kəl\
Function: adjective
Date: 1660
1 : characterized by or given to the expression of opinions very strongly or positively as if they were facts <a dogmatic critic>
2 : of or relating to dogma
synonyms see dictatorial
— dog·mat·i·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb
— dog·mat·i·cal·ness \-ti-kəl-nəs\ noun


Main Entry: 1prej·u·dice
Pronunciation: \ˈpre-jə-dəs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin praejudicium previous judgment, damage, from prae- + judicium judgment — more at judicial
Date: 13th century
1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics
synonyms see predilection


Main Entry: as·sump·tion
Pronunciation: \ə-ˈsəm(p)-shən\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin assumption-, assumptio taking up, from Latin assumere
Date: 13th century
1 a : the taking up of a person into heaven b capitalized : August 15 observed in commemoration of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary
2 : a taking to or upon oneself <the assumption of a new position>
3 : the act of laying claim to or taking possession of something <the assumption of power>
4 : arrogance, pretension
5 a : an assuming that something is true b : a fact or statement (as a proposition, axiom, postulate, or notion) taken for granted
6 : the taking over of another's debts

[Jj999]

Welcome to the Aus99 University:

Current lecture:

Social Psychology 101

Enjoy

Cheers

It's more of language class actually.

How far particular word can bend and twist.

So far we have demonstrated that "assumption" and "prejudice" are both showing similar properties of able to be bended and twisted.
And Galactus bro has introduced new definitions for those words which practically rubbished high credibility english dictionaries.

He still need to show the new of definition those two though,
But he directed current attention, on the possibilities of bend & twist, and make a new definition of "dogmatic".

[cisco]

I just read this thread again, my question is Guys , Where are we now ?