100 Annerley rd

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by truth

Todays Sunday Mail has a puff piece from QPS Comms says 'customers on one online adult services forum openly discussed booking workers from a Brisbane southside massage parlour said to offer "extras" via Wechat". So yeah Police do use these forums for easy intel.

---

It will be interesting to see if there will be more action or why this piece was run.
It did highlight the intent to attack organised crime. Best to be tight with info i guess

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hammered

Sexual harassment laws have little to do with sex worker situations.
In “normal” working conditions, there is no implied or explicit contract of money for sexual services. With sex workers, that’s exactly the contract.

---

I would love to see you try that as your defense in court. "yes your honor, it was an implied term of the contract of service when I walked into the massage shop that I would get sexual services"..... *in comes the Bailiff with handcuffs*

The contract for service you are paying for is MASSAGE. Anything you negotiate with the ML is called an extra IF she agrees to it. There are well established shops in Brisbane that have a reputation of MLs rejecting customers requests, so to say it is implied in the contract is utterly wrong.

100 Annerley did not use WeChat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ecchi.gaijin

I would love to see you try that as your defense in court. "yes your honor, it was an implied term of the contract of service when I walked into the massage shop that I would get sexual services"..... *in comes the Bailiff with handcuffs*

The contract for service you are paying for is MASSAGE. Anything you negotiate with the ML is called an extra IF she agrees to it. There are well established shops in Brisbane that have a reputation of MLs rejecting customers requests, so to say it is implied in the contract is utterly wrong.

---

You just made my point by trying to argue against it.
Yes, initially the massage is the contract. Then ANOTHER negotiation is done, where services for money is agreed upon. That’s a contract. Regardless of how shaky the foundation may be, it’s the oldest form of contract that exists. A verbal contract. If the ML does NOT agree, then there’s no contract.

Sexual harassment is a civil matter until things progress to assault. That doesn’t mean physically touching, just the implied or assumed threat of harm. So to suggest that an appearance in court handcuffed for sexual harassment for negotiations of extras is utterly wrong. But hey, maybe you’re a little more aggressive and domineering with how you do it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hammered

You just made my point by trying to argue against it.
Yes, initially the massage is the contract. Then ANOTHER negotiation is done, where services for money is agreed upon. That’s a contract. Regardless of how shaky the foundation may be, it’s the oldest form of contract that exists. A verbal contract. If the ML does NOT agree, then there’s no contract. Sexual harassment is a civil matter until things progress to assault. That doesn’t mean physically touching, just the implied or assumed threat of harm. So to suggest that an appearance in court handcuffed for sexual harassment for negotiations of extras is utterly wrong. But hey, maybe you’re a little more aggressive and domineering with how you do it?

---

Boys boys boys - yes a verbal contract is binding. But proving it in a court is usually a "he said, she said" scenario and without corroborating evidence there is reasonable doubt so goodbye to that one. And of course we all know sexual services do not happen in MS so are you going to implicate yourself and the ML? Hammered give up trying to make some posters on here see reason - by their posts some obviously have nothing to do and then end up calling ppl names. How do you know when you've won an argument ? They resort to name calling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hammered

You just made my point by trying to argue against it.
Yes, initially the massage is the contract. Then ANOTHER negotiation is done, where services for money is agreed upon. That’s a contract. Regardless of how shaky the foundation may be, it’s the oldest form of contract that exists. A verbal contract. If the ML does NOT agree, then there’s no contract.

Sexual harassment is a civil matter until things progress to assault. That doesn’t mean physically touching, just the implied or assumed threat of harm. So to suggest that an appearance in court handcuffed for sexual harassment for negotiations of extras is utterly wrong. But hey, maybe you’re a little more aggressive and domineering with how you do it?

---

Jesus Christ you are thick. If you proposition a ML, you have in fact committed sexual harassment as the sexual nature IS NOT part of the initial contract of services. Just as if you proposition anyone else in a commercial situation.

If you admit to a crime during a civil court case, you can/will be referred to the bailiff for charges.

I am not more aggressive in my interactions, but I have been in the game long enough to hear the numerous stories from MLs about rape, verbal abuse, physical abuse and blatant sexual harassment that does occur. Obviously you haven't if you think otherwise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ecchi.gaijin

have been in the game long enough to hear the numerous stories from MLs about rape, verbal abuse, physical abuse and blatant sexual harassment that does occur.

---

And that’s just brown wallaby...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ecchi.gaijin

Jesus Christ you are thick. If you proposition a ML, you have in fact committed sexual harassment as the sexual nature IS NOT part of the initial contract of services. Just as if you proposition anyone else in a commercial situation.

---

Ok, Champ. I defer to your obviously greater knowledge.

Can we have the fuckwittery comments taken elsewhere?

Yes it’s funny to see two guys having dick measure contest but it’s not why we are here.

You only make yourself look a tosser.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RockHardGuy

Can we have the fuckwittery comments taken elsewhere?

Yes it’s funny to see two guys having dick measure contest but it’s not why we are here.

You only make yourself look a tosser.

---

couldn't agree more