I Used AI to Analyse Hundreds of Aus99 Reviews - 90 Shortlisted Girls, 16 Shops, 2 Tiers

G'day guys..

I'm a bit of an AI geek. I use agentic AI and automation extensively for work, so today I thought I'd put it to a completely different use.

What if I could get AI to scan hundreds of AUS99 reviews, compare everyone's experiences, filter out the noise and produce a shortlist of the most consistently recommended WLs/MLs?

So that's what I've been doing.

I went through multiple shop categories, individual threads, replies and repeat experiences. Then I combined the findings with my own firsthand experiences and a few names on my wishlist.

The result: 90 entries across 16 Sydney shop/location groups, split into two tiers.


HOW I FILTERED THE REVIEWS

I didn't simply ask my AI, "Who's the best?"

I used three weighted factors:

• 50% .. Natural chemistry and intimacy: Friendly, naughty playfulness, good conversation, laughter, teasing, genuine warmth and personality. Not robotic or mechanical.
• 25% .. Attentiveness and effort: Engaged throughout, makes you comfortable, doesn't unnecessarily rush or clock-watch.
• 25% .. Review consistency: Positive experiences from different members, repeat visits and how consistently the feedback holds up.

Additional filters:

• Prioritised roughly the last 15 months of reviews. Older reports were considered as supporting evidence where useful.
• Predominantly negative review histories were excluded.
• Mixed reviews were considered only where the overall evidence remained strongly positive.
• Looked for independent reviewers rather than counting multiple posts from the same person.
• Discounted shop promotions, obvious hype and questionable review credibility.
• Checked negative experiences, potential name changes and movement between shops.
• Technical massage skills were NOT part of my scoring.

I've deliberately limited the research to shops I've visited, can realistically travel to, or would consider visiting.


UNDERSTANDING THE TWO TIERS

Tier 1 .. Strongest Positive Reviews
My highest-confidence shortlist. The intended benchmark was approximately 95-100% positive feedback, with particularly strong evidence of personality, attentiveness and consistency.

Tier 2 .. Mostly Positive / Promising
The broader benchmark was 80%+ positive feedback. These names may have fewer reviews, older evidence or occasional mixed experiences.

Important: These percentages are indicative confidence bands, not mathematically verified scores for every individual.
Tier 2 does NOT mean bad. It simply means the available evidence isn't as strong or consistent as Tier 1.


TOP 90 .. THE ULTIMATE SYDNEY SHOP-BY-SHOP SHORTLIST

1. 227 NORTH STRATHFIELD MASSAGE
Tier 1: Ester, Mellisa, Soda
Tier 2: Freya, Gina, Kara, Layla


2. 192 RYDE / 252 STANMORE / 42 CROWN / 69 SAVANN - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: Jasmine, Anna, Nadia, Lucia, Pia, Mimi, Soda
Tier 2: Demi, Julie, Meena, Pink / Pinky


3. 107 CHILL
Tier 1: Angela, Aggie
Tier 2: Amber, Ella, Kim, Nadia, Siena


4. 14 CONCORD MASSAGE
Tier 1: Evelyn, Rani
Tier 2: Isabella, Linda, Sonya, Trixie


5. 331 CONCORD MASSAGE
Tier 1: -
Tier 2: Lia, Quinn, Sky, Susie


6. 408 AMORA MERRYLANDS
Tier 1: Hannah, Linda, Nadia, Soda, Zoey
Tier 2: Jasmine, Kendall, Kimberly, Kylie


7. 42 GLADESVILLE
Tier 1: Harumi, Jay, Joa
Tier 2: -


8. DREAM GIRL 130 / DREAM GIRL 115 - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: -
Tier 2: Aggie, Nina, Skye


9. LE SOLEIL MASSAGE, CROYDON
Tier 1: Erica, Patty, Soda
Tier 2: Summer


10. MIRAGE 108 / PLATINUM 121 - Sister shops: girls rotate.
Tier 1: Miko, Chase, Kaho, Maria
Tier 2: Karu, Mia, Rami


11. NO. 5 MARRICKVILLE (N5M)
Tier 1: Cindy, Hanna, Hazel, Jay, Leah, Mia, Naomi, Paula
Tier 2: -


12. PARRAMATTA BLOSSOM MASSAGE
Tier 1: Apple, Ching Ching, Liya, Milin, Sabrina
Tier 2: Ivy, Maggie, Mona, Soki


13. SUMMERVILLE MASSAGE, PYRMONT
Tier 1: Ice, Momo, Pen
Tier 2: Canny, Nicole


14. SYDNEY BABY MASSAGE
Tier 1: Milin, Monica
Tier 2: -


15. SYDNEY GIRL MASSAGE
Tier 1: Eva, Maggie
Tier 2: -


16. VELVET ROSE
Tier 1: Giana, Selina
Tier 2: Winona, Yumiko, Rani


HOW TO FIND THE ORIGINAL AUS99 REVIEWS

This shortlist is based on AUS99 forum discussions and reviews.

Every name was drawn from this forum material written by members (one of you), alongside my own personal experience where applicable.

Simply search Google: WL/ML name + Shop name + AUS99

You'll generally find the relevant AUS99 discussions, and for many names, multiple firsthand reviews written by different members (one of you).

Read those individual experiences and judge for yourself.

This is a consolidated shortlist, not a replacement for reading the original reviews.


MY OWN EXPERIENCES vs. AI RESEARCH

Just to clarify, this isn't entirely AI-generated opinion.

I've combined four things:

• My own firsthand experiences with ladies I've personally visited.
• Other AUS99 members' experiences shared on the forum.
• My wishlist of ladies I haven't visited but whose reviews caught my attention.
• Most importantly, AI-powered filters, factors and considerations applied using the weighted criteria explained at the beginning of this post.

So please don't assume I've personally visited everyone listed!


FINAL THOUGHTS

AUS99 is full of useful information, but it's scattered across hundreds of threads.
One reviewer loves someone, another has a different experience, and a third mentions she worked somewhere else under another name.
That's exactly the sort of messy information AI is useful for organising.

I thought I'd share the result rather than keep it to myself. Hopefully it's useful to a few of you.

And I'd genuinely appreciate some feedback:

• Who on the Tier 1 list do you strongly agree or disagree with?
• Who from Tier 2 deserves to be upgraded?
• Have I missed anyone with consistently excellent reviews?

Firsthand experiences only, ideally. That's what makes this forum valuable.

cheers guys!

Firstly hats off for the effort and time you've put in for the forum and its member - great appreciated
It's a field I'm lost in :-) - used (the latest high tech editor) to write reports on an Amstrad with <B> text </B> etc

A few (personal) observations to start the ball rolling

1. Soda
appears on 3 x Tier 1's - certainly a few years ago she was 100% up there - had it all & offered it all with total passion naughtiness amd a smile but became jaded lately

2. Freya / Summer (regular)
Should be elevated to Tier 1 - has and still delivers the full Monty - incredible genuine massage and extras ? Well you'd be hard pressed to find better though her BBBJ can be a bit toothy at times but we're working on that one
& yes I've helped her on this forum so acknowledge that a favourite over 4 years now and still a regular and every time I see her she's does something different or new & continually asks what's other girls do I like so she can learn - dedicated to the profession and always wanting to improve

3. 192 Ryde etc 'Ada's shops
I'll leave this for others to comment on girls !
Another personal bug bare of mine as believe massive % of theses AR's are not of 'genuine sessions' / fake used to simply promote the shops - would be interested in you doing an AI review on Ada's shops of ARs that have been written from profiles
a) that have < 10 & < 20 posts prior to the review
B) that do not mention details ie $ amts and specific extras - generalised drivel

4. Sonya 14 Concord (Friday) should be Tier 1.5 :-)
Been MIA for a while but OMG she's like a dusky & slimmer version of Soda on Red Bull great body, incredible breasts, variable intensity to suit the mood and a passion that literally vacuums you empty. Delight from start to finish and will give you 150% for the whole session

Anyway once again thanks for all your efforts

Hey mate, good stuff.

Results seem thereabouts to who this forum enjoys.

Question - what AI model did you use?

Interesting, thank you edging. Surprised that Ginza doesn’t appear. A purely subjective perusal of this forum suggests Wilson’s girls are highly considered.

Thanks for the effort!

Sadly some of the Tier 1 & 2 girls might not be in the industry anymore as I haven't seen their names on the roster.

eg. Harumi at 42, Ice/Canny at Summerville

Would be good to turn this into a dashboard where we cn change weightings and criteria. Part 1 is important to me, for example.

Agree with 192 Ryde/Ada's shops needing to be exempted. They have a high volume of fake reviews. I have had great punts there but your model would need to denoise the reviews significantly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wayne

Interesting, thank you edging. Surprised that Ginza doesn’t appear. A purely subjective perusal of this forum suggests Wilson’s girls are highly considered.

---

The OP states that he limited this review to shops he’s visited, realistically can travel to, or would consider visiting. Perhaps Ginza doesn’t fit this criteria for him. With a few noticeable exceptions a lot of the places are massage / rnt joints rather than full service brothels.

Thanks for this OP.

Did your AI analysis consider only ‘AR’ posts or were you also scouring general discussion and other threads for discussion on girls?

Can your AI model easily distinguish between different girls with the same name?

Also, wondering how much your personal experiences and wish list influenced the outcome as opposed to the pure AI analysis of posts here?

Amazing effort.

And the posts in the AR section around 3am, what?

I wish our shops overlap more, but they dont. Shame.

Ai sucks bro. The machines will soon rise and they don't care about who gives a better gobby

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Icegodofhungary

Thanks for this OP.

Did your AI analysis consider only ‘AR’ posts or were you also scouring general discussion and other threads for discussion on girls?

Can your AI model easily distinguish between different girls with the same name?

Also, wondering how much your personal experiences and wish list influenced the outcome as opposed to the pure AI analysis of posts here?

---

Really good questions. Let me clarify how I approached it.

1. Which posts did the AI analyse?
I only scanned the Sydney – After Report (AR) section.
The analysis covered the last 15 months of threads and all replies within that section. I did not include general discussion or other sections of the forum.

2. Can the AI distinguish between different girls with the same name, or the same girl using different names?
No, not reliably.
The AI cannot automatically identify when two girls share the same name or when the same girl operates under different names. That would require additional manual input, cross-referencing and ongoing refinement.

3. How much did your personal experience influence the results?
This is probably the most important question.

Over the past two years, I've seen around 100 girls, averaging roughly one per week. However, that includes experiences at Kings Court and E&B Privates, which have relatively few reviews on this forum.

From those experiences, I selected my 5 best personal experiences as benchmarks:

Ester / Pen from Summerville and 227 NS
Miko from 108 Mirage
Anna and Jasmine from 192 Ryde
And a couple more..

I then fed the AI:

All the reviews I had personally written about these girls.
All Other members' reviews of the same girls on Aus99 over the last 15 months.
I asked the AI to thoroughly analyse these reviews and understand what made these experiences stand out. These became my benchmark for what I considered a top-tier experience.


Here is how the overall filtering worked:

First 3 filters: Purely AI-driven analysis of all AR posts, using the criteria and weightings outlined in my original post.

Final filter: I compared the results against the benchmark established from my 5 best personal experiences.

Girls who closely matched that benchmark were classified as Tier 1.
Girls who received very positive reviews but didn't quite meet the 95–100% benchmark were classified as Tier 2.

Negative or mixed reviews were excluded.


So, how much was personal preference involved?

My rough estimate would be:
75–80%: AI analysis of members' AR reviews.
20–25%: My personal preferences and experiences, used as the final benchmark.

So, it wasn't purely an objective AI ranking, nor was it simply a list based on my personal favourites.

It was a combination of analysing the collective experiences shared by members and using my own best experiences as the final quality benchmark.

Hope that clears up the methodology and the extent of my personal influence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrPB

Hey mate, good stuff.

Results seem thereabouts to who this forum enjoys.

Question - what AI model did you use?

---

I used GPT-6.1 Terra connected with Google Sheets Plugin and applied some tricks I learned at prompt engineering course.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firekombi

Amazing effort.

And the posts in the AR section around 3am, what?

I wish our shops overlap more, but they dont. Shame.

---

Yeah, I have UK clients so I work till late. Hence 3am posts haha.
Curious what are your favourite shops?

Without factual statistics such as age, height size and ethnicity of the girls I definitely would be able to use those tier information above. Those are important to a lot of punters. I rather read one review and if it seems my cup of tea, nite it down as one to visit. And go through all the ones I noted. I won't need this AI summary. It's very subjective

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Linza Giz

Ai sucks bro. The machines will soon rise and they don't care about who gives a better gobby

---

Haha, yes, I agree! That's why I didn't use AI to generate reviews or decide who's good..

I simply used it to organise the thousands of reviews, identify consistent positive feedback and build a shortlist..

Budget is always limited, and nobody wants a dud punt. I've now got around 90 on my shortlist, or roughly half that if I stick to Tier 1..

Ultimately, I'm just using AI as a tool to make better-informed choices, save time and hopefully avoid wasting money..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paulgallen

Without factual statistics such as age, height size and ethnicity of the girls I definitely would be able to use those tier information above. Those are important to a lot of punters. I rather read one review and if it seems my cup of tea, nite it down as one to visit. And go through all the ones I noted. I won't need this AI summary. It's very subjective

---

You'll notice that most of the shops on the list are R&T, where the girls are generally in the 20–35 age range, which works for me personally. So age isn't a major concern, as these shops generally cater to that preference. The list also includes a mix of body types, reflecting the different personal tastes of people who have contributed to the AR sections.

The purpose of this exercise was to narrow down the huge number of ML and WL options across Sydney, rather than assess every individual girl. I wanted a smaller shortlist to improve my chances of avoiding a dud punt. So now, I'd focus on Tier 1 and 2, read the individual reviews and further narrow down my choices depending on my mood and when I'm planning to visit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wayne

Interesting, thank you edging. Surprised that Ginza doesn’t appear. A purely subjective perusal of this forum suggests Wilson’s girls are highly considered.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Icegodofhungary

The OP states that he limited this review to shops he’s visited, realistically can travel to, or would consider visiting. Perhaps Ginza doesn’t fit this criteria for him.

---

@Icegodofhungary Yes, you're right. That's exactly why Ginza wasn't included.

@Wayne Let me explain a little further, as I know Ginza has quite a few fans on this forum and some may wonder why it's missing.

There are a few reasons:

1. As mentioned in my original post, the list is limited to shops I've visited, can realistically travel to, or would consider visiting.

2. The list contains 16 shop mentions, but I've visited around 20 in the last two years. Some were deliberately excluded because, in my personal opinion, they were disappointing due to the roster, venue, service or a combination of these. Midnight Tokyo 8 and Roseville Rose are examples.

3. There are also places I personally like and visit, such as Kings Court and Secrets of Sydney, which aren't included because they don't get much discussion on this forum, and perhaps aren't of much interest to its members. They're also more expensive, and I've found other good R&T options nearby that offer better value.

As for Ginza specifically, I've never visited because it's in Surry Hills, an area I rarely travel to. More importantly, when I checked its website, I noticed it stated that Indians were not accepted. I found that offensive and, quite frankly, discriminatory.

I've lived half my life outside India and take pride in being well-presented, well-groomed, well-mannered and respectful. I never haggle over money, and I've always been treated well in my social and professional circles. I simply don't see why nationality should be a basis for a blanket exclusion. For that reason, I have no intention of visiting. Think about how you would feel if you walked into an establishment and someone immediately judged and rejected you purely on the basis of your skin colour or ethnicity, without knowing anything about you. Your personality, character, manners, upbringing, how you carry yourself and how you treat others would all be irrelevant. You would be judged before you even had the opportunity to demonstrate who you really are. Surely, that is disgraceful and deeply offensive.

That's precisely how I view this situation. punting is fun, enjoyable and important, but it never comes at the expense of respect and pride. No hobby or experience is worth compromising those things in my opinion..

I also personally prefer a natural build over particularly skinny girls, so Ginza isn't somewhere I'm particularly drawn to anyway.

Ultimately, this is a personal shortlist based on my experiences, preferences and willingness to visit. It's not intended to be a definitive ranking of every shop in Sydney.

I've made around 50 posts on this forum, mostly detailed reviews rather than questions, because I genuinely want to contribute and help others avoid dud punts and have better experiences. I'll continue contributing, but Ginza won't appear in my reviews..

Hopefully that clears things up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jaquedm1307

Firstly hats off for the effort and time you've put in for the forum and its member - great appreciated
It's a field I'm lost in :-) - used (the latest high tech editor) to write reports on an Amstrad with <B> text </B> etc

A few (personal) observations to start the ball rolling

1. Soda
appears on 3 x Tier 1's - certainly a few years ago she was 100% up there - had it all & offered it all with total passion naughtiness amd a smile but became jaded lately

2. Freya / Summer (regular)
Should be elevated to Tier 1 - has and still delivers the full Monty - incredible genuine massage and extras ? Well you'd be hard pressed to find better though her BBBJ can be a bit toothy at times but we're working on that one
& yes I've helped her on this forum so acknowledge that a favourite over 4 years now and still a regular and every time I see her she's does something different or new & continually asks what's other girls do I like so she can learn - dedicated to the profession and always wanting to improve

3. 192 Ryde etc 'Ada's shops
I'll leave this for others to comment on girls !
Another personal bug bare of mine as believe massive % of theses AR's are not of 'genuine sessions' / fake used to simply promote the shops - would be interested in you doing an AI review on Ada's shops of ARs that have been written from profiles
a) that have < 10 & < 20 posts prior to the review
B) that do not mention details ie $ amts and specific extras - generalised drivel

4. Sonya 14 Concord (Friday) should be Tier 1.5 :-)
Been MIA for a while but OMG she's like a dusky & slimmer version of Soda on Red Bull great body, incredible breasts, variable intensity to suit the mood and a passion that literally vacuums you empty. Delight from start to finish and will give you 150% for the whole session

Anyway once again thanks for all your efforts

---

Thanks mate, really appreciate the input and suggestions.

Interesting points about Freya and Sonya. Both are actually on my wish list, as they have received very, very positive reviews on this platform. I haven't seen either personally, although I've visited the shop and seen others there, including Pen/Ester..

Regarding Ada's shops, that's an interesting point and certainly worth looking into.. I've had some pretty good experiences at the shops mentioned in my Tier 1, and most of that Tier 1 I've personally experienced (except Pia & Mimi). That said, I've also had dud punts there with Miranda and the overly hyped Mika and Candy, which is why they haven't made the list. And maybe that's where I guess your point is fair and valid..

Fairly accurate tier 1 and tier 2 based on my experience

That’s amazing.

Can definitely vouch for Ching Ching, Kaho, Chase, Selina all being tier 1’s - I would put Yumiko in that category as well.

Rani is tier 1 at 14 concord but tier 2 at Velvet (same girl)

No mention of Hayley at Amora who is A Grade as well