-
As usual full of lies and bad logic, Methinks thou dost protest too much!
Note you are on my ignore list for being a shill so I won't bother reading anymore of your bullshit, please put me on your ignore list also.
Here is my response, but it is not to you it is for the benefit of others, so don't answer any of the questions below, they are all rhetorical (look it up if you don't know what it means):
> OK, so you went to check out SL based on my reviews and you didn't know the shop has no shower,
I never mentioned a shower, this is irrelevant.
> fair enough ! And judging by your post you had a pretty shitty session so basically that's all my fault of course.
Yes, because you lied about her age, looks, service, and body shape. I wasted money because you lied.
> All I can say is, I stood by everything I posted
Predictably of course you would that is what liars do, unless they have a conscience, but you don't have one, you have no moral compass as evidenced in public by some of your threads and there is plenty of private evidence for this also.
> , and if my experiences were better than yours, well, I can't apologise for that, Baby and I were both from Hong Kong - I should be getting better services and rapport shouldn't I ?
Why would you get better service if you were from Hong Kong, are you turning this into a racial issue now.
> So, based on that one bad experience you had decided that I was a Shill
No, but that got me wondering, There were others, and also a whole pattern of behaviour from you on the forum relating to, but not limited to: advertising for shops in general talk; being warned many times not to do this and still doing it; various lies about girls and shops; inaccurate reviews which sounded more like shop reviews than punter review, etc etc.
> but then again I have told everyone that Vicky is a good friend of mine right from the start and at the time I was helping her to post roster for the shop daily ............ would a shill do that openly and honestly ??
Yes. Punters post honest reviews, shills post advertising and rosters for shops.
> One more thing, there is no way Baby was in her 40's. she might be late 20's at the time - so your assessment of 40's was totally out man !
Ok so you admit you lied about here age now. You said she was 20, now you say late 20s. That is what a shill would do. Also I bet I could get you to go into the high 30s if I could be bothered to describe her body, her worn face, and her "tired" voice in detail.
> Last but not least, your review was posted on 03/05/2013 ! If by then you had decided that I was a Shill, why were we continued to be in very friendly terms right up to this thread when I congratulated you for your 1,000 posts ? Which was in Oct 2013!
As above I didn't decide on the spot I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but as the evidence mounted my conscience did not allow me to condone your shill behaviour and con others into wasting money based on your bullshit. Yes we were friends but I have seen how you operate now and you don't have real friends you just want to be liked by everyone so you say and do anything to be liked, you are a sycophant. I used to defend you against trolls but not anymore.
> There was either something else that flipped you much later after that or your were so fake that you were happy to remain friends with a senior member in the forum and waited waited and waited until you built up some mileage ??
See above.
> Either way, it didn't bother me as I usually won't attack other member until I have to defence myself. But all these talk of Shill - is it not wearing a bit too thin now ?
You have attacked others to defend the shops you shill for.
Also remember when you attacked babycat multiple times for being a fake ...
One last thing, recently in another forum (which you have been warned multiple times) on a gold thread where you posted a dubious review and were criticised by alot of respected gold members, you then posted a followup review of a girl called Emma. Well I thought I would go and see Emma so I did, to cut a long story short you lied about the following:
- prices - she quoted me different prices to what you posted
- shower - it was out of action when I saw her just a few days after your review
- pretty - she wasn't pretty
- not fat - she was fat, had a double chin, and chubby all over
- flat tummy - see above
- age - you said early 20s. I asked her some questions and worked out she was mid 20's at best but most likely late 20s or early 30s.
The only thing that was true was her breast size, but they were not appealing and saggy.
This review was 5th May 2017, 12:41 PM, and the first fake review I spotted was 2013, I'll leave others to decide what this means.
Note I have not bothered to reply to your review on the other forum yet.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules