Quote Originally Posted by Cigarandwhisky View Post
I read OPs original post and made a throwaway account for this response but here goes:

1. The WL had every right to impose any restriction at any time and you chose to ignore it. She gave you her time to provide a service to you under certain conditions and you violated her terms and she is entitled to cease providing her service to you at anytime.

2. The $100 refund refusal is not even unreasonable because it covers the WL from losing out on time for providing services to you and not to mention the time spent getting herself ready for the next customer - why should she lose out on income for refusing to service a delinquent customer through no fault of her own?

3. The shop’s response may not be top tier but honestly I completely understand the response rendered to what sounds like entitled whining from a grown ass man. You clearly think that money entitles you to treat these WLs as objects and the right to crappy behaviour. In this industry you pay the woman for her TIME and not her body, what she is happy to do for you within that time is entirely up to her. You happen to have wasted both the WL and the shop’s time so I get why the manager was unhappy with you.

4. Your continued whining in the second post only calls attention to what you have done to deserve this and it serves nothing but to embarrass you even further.

Just be an adult and let the goddamn thing go.
Thanks for your comments.
First and foremost, I respect working ladies. I did not say the girl cannot give rule as long as there are consents. For respect, I or we sometimes follow girls' rules, despite that we are not informed before entering nor we think reasonable in a top tier services at a brothel. I respect the girl's decision or rules without ridiculing them, although many fellow punters agree that constant no touching on boobs is very weird in full sexual services. Much more weird is that a shop has no understanding on the frustration on the customers' side. It even did not listen.
There has never been a case brought up against a punter for assaulting by touching a working lady' boobs in a brothel, even none in a massage parlour setting.
Frankly, a judge would say if a prostitute does not want her boobs to be touched, the best way is not to work in this sort of industry. If it were an assault, many punters would be scared to patronise a brothel or even a massage parlour, for fearing an allegation can be easily made against them.
There are many implied terms in providing services. Some terms cannot even be aboragated without mutual consent, preferably in writing. If the shop is to do something right, the best way is to ask clients to sign terms and conditions before entering a room for sex services. At least those uncommon conditions should be in writing displayed at an easily-visible place.
After all, I am not criticizing the girl, Anna, who has her own attractions and assets to please her clients. I am talking about and complaining about the way how conflicts were dealt with by the shop reception. There could be more to elaborate on the questions how and why the reception would handle this kind of matter in such an offensive way. Does the owner or manager know that? Is it an incident of normal practices or just a rare occasion because I look ugly or inferior or weak?
As an adult, I have never had my money thrown on the ground for me to pick up. What would you fellow adult punters do if you experience this kind of thing once in your lifetime?