Quote Originally Posted by frisson View Post
I don't understand the basis of the claim that the taxpayer was liable for what happened to Brittany and paid her over $2 million
What does the taxpayer have to do with funding her paymemt of a French house??
All this speculation about the tawdry drunken sex affair is merely trivial gossip.

The only thing that concerns me is the 2.4 taxpayer million handed over in a flash without any of the usual timelines, procedures and safeguards. It stinks. The new Federal corruption watchdog had better investigate it, provided it has teeth - or why does it exist. If they do it properly I see sackings and refunds of monies coming.