Quote Originally Posted by Cracker38 View Post
One of the big problems I see with this whole scenario is the issue regarding how the two individuals met. This isn’t a usual romance scam where u have met someone through a dating app, or out somewhere and then they have taken your money in some false loan arrangement.
The Op and all the others who appear to have suffered the same fate all met the ML in a scenario where they were paying money for a sexual service. This was her job and they were all engaging her for this service and a financial payment had to be made to cover this service.
At what point, even when they were seeing her outside of shops, did they believe that they were no longer contracting the services of a professional sex worker that payment would no longer be required.
Wasn’t she just providing the ‘Girl Friend Experience’ a service that is listed routinely by shops and girls as a service that is provided.
Do not escorts attend dinner/events and even oversees holidays with clients, all of which requires payment.
Could she not turn around with a log of all times she spent with everyone and claim that she believed she was still providing a professional service in the guise of providing a GF service, a service that requires financial payment.
I’m just wondering in this scenario, when the whole initial basis of the meets was a pay to play scenario, when did people believe that the circumstances had changed??

Why wouldn’t the ML in question just be able to hand everyone an invoice/receipt for services rendered as an Escort?
Great point! I think this legal action stuff is going to blow up in OP's face. Leave it be and let karma run its course. And most importantly, never "loan" money to a whore!