Reaffirming the wisdom of International School Guidance, "Read the most recent 20 PAGES of a thread before posting", if one follows such guidance, it's clear there are reviews of the parties. Fairly easy to pick out, just look for more than 1 line posts. While some might only be a couple of lines, some more, they would certainly seem to meet YOUR criteria (though perhaps not mine) of legit critiques. Your complaint seems a bit hypocritical, but that is certainly the norm for you.
Perhaps you couldn't be bothered to read some ancient history, or perhaps they just didn't provide YOU with the intel YOU wanted (yea, it's a hard life).
As in:
This thread's page number (intel posts): Pages 7(2), 10(1), 13(3), 16(1), 19(3)
vs "best" of your "work":
Bit of a slog but pretty easy with 1-2 line posts on both sides, and I don't need to move my lips while reading (unlike some others which might explain their ignorance of available intel). Actually, a couple of reviews in this thread much more informative than any of yours...
And then to cast aspersions on the organizer...
Feel free to respond with "Grumpy Old Man" aspersions, but you might try posting a logical argument proving the above wrong. Granted, the former so easy, the latter... might take a bit of work (cites required).
=============
HardCore, apt handle. Clear to anyone who's literate that you and your "functions'" are legit. The existing reviews provide a sufficient description of what one can expect (as the Thais say, "Same same but different").
You obviously can defend yourself, I just had some time to kill before kickoff.












Reply With Quote





