Reply With QuoteGiven their fear of losing their jobs, it's interesting they willingly placed their livelihood in a customer's hands. There was nothing to gain for them to say anything.Originally Posted by desolateguy
|
Doubt council shut it down. I never believe our government does anything
Given their fear of losing their jobs, it's interesting they willingly placed their livelihood in a customer's hands. There was nothing to gain for them to say anything.
Never believe anything a SWer says. OP should let Ada know and identify the ones who told him
Punting by definition is?
Uncertainty.
Risk.
Transgression.
Excitement.
Anonymity.
Discretion.
Vulnerability.
Consent.
Consequences.
Man up — TOFTT, YMMV.
And yet, for all the swagger, so much of it is really...
“Is there a back entrance?”
“I’m worried I’ll get caught.”
“What happens if my wife smells it?”
Quack, quack, quack.
Your right to anonymity.
Your privacy.
Your protection.
As if these are some divine right. An entitlement.
But the service provider has no basic right to SAFETY? No right to PRIVACY?
Was the service bad? No.
So what actually happened? Nothing.
You found something out. Your perception changed.
What swaggering libertines.
You didn't tell us the most important thing, how did the session finish? Did she/he give you a BJ or HE or did she/he offer you more? Backdoor entry perhaps?
Did you get turned off when you saw the scars and lose your hard on and leave ????
---No matter how you look at it, punting is a lot cheaper than divorce.---
Our government does a lot:
They tax you.
Let that be part of your imagination.
You don't want to know everything.
One thing I'm sure that Ada hates to read this and the effect it does to her shop.
She is the high priest in cultivating the punters in this forum since the early days of 200 Parramatta Rd.
they TAX what you OWN
they TAX what you EARN
they TAX what you BUY
......the cunts can't be trusted!
They did shut it down ask the shops next door they probably told the council. Councils will get tougher you cannot have FS shops paying DA fees thousands of dollars and sneaky massage shops disguising themselves and providing FS.
The Council wants fees.
As for Sammy I have had a massage from her I figured it out in 2 seconds she was a pre-op she was ok nice girl not bad massage everything else is hopeless.
The problem is i agree with the first post you must advertise if it’s a ladyboy or not. It’s totally wrong.
The whole world knows Thais cannot be trusted smiling assassins.
Unfortunately it’s got to Ada’s head and she should pull her head in. I know her for years she is a decent lass but she has definitely changed which is not good. Unfortunately in this situation she is totally wrong.
Be yourself Ada.
I just saw the roster Sammy the post op ladyboy is working at Stanmore today. Like I said some customers might like her Ada should advertise her as Post-Op.
And it's literally illegal to engage in prostitution in non-sex licensed premise massage parlours
That’s why the Council closed Five Dock. A disgruntled customer or a neighbour can go to the Council report the business and they will be closed.
Council didn't close it. It would cost them too much money to exercise this operation.
I used to work for a Council and they are aware of these illegal massage parlours running sex services. They have set up an Environmental Team to go around in suburbs.
They will start closing a lot down. They closed a few in the Hills District it’s only a matter of time.
Fuck I think I was in denial but after seeing the replies I fear you might be right.
What are our thoughts on Meena and Momo from the same shop? Meena has the body of a very petite male, mainly due to lack of assets. Momos service is amazing but the face always gave me 2nd thoughts.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK…
Her LEGAL ENTITLEMENT TO PRIVACY AND SAFETY IS FUNDAMENTAL and her MEDICAL and SURGICAL HISTORY is PRIVATE .
You are not entitled to it because you paid for 30 minutes.
Yet here you are publicly speculating when you don’t even know the facts.
One says PRE-OP.
Another POST-OP.
Both certain.
And the “consumer rights” indignation. ??? Really
“she/he”
“backdoor entry”
scars
erections
her genitals
“Thais cannot be trusted”
Consumer advocacy?
Really?
KATHOEY — loosely “ladyboy” to the West — sits in a very different cultural and social space in Thailand.
Then add the ugly Australian bit.
Male entitlement. Prejudice. Outrage
Because YOU are uncomfortable, YOU are somehow entitled to dismiss her right to SAFETY, PRIVACY and CONSENT?
NO.
You paid for her time and whatever extra was agreed.
You did not buy the woman. - You got a service. No complaint - Then later you 'found' something out.
Now you feel different. - Refund?
Or refuse to pay for an extra already received?
Seriously?
NOTHING ABOUT THE WOMAN CHANGED.
NOTHING ABOUT THE SERVICE CHANGED.
YOUR PERCEPTION CHANGED.
Yet from that comes outing, humiliation and a public autopsy of the woman…
followed by you all trotting about on your Olympic-grade hobby horses.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK
And those demanding the shop advertise her as a LADYBOY —
Who gave CONSENT for the shop to label and advertise her that way?
Her private information is not theirs to market.
Without her consent, they have no business doing it.
And you none!
Cumquat I like to agree with you mate but you’re wrong. We all know many shops advertise fake photos size, age etc etc.
But when you book a female you should get a female. My opinion. I have been with Sammy I knew in 1 second she was a ladyboy and I could have walked out and chose somebody else. But I didn’t and it was my choice.
She definitely must have her regulars and popular because she is still around. Some guys probably don’t mind because who would think a ladyboy is working in a massage shop.
But yes they must let customers know.
I appreciate your opinion and the IMPORTANT point you made .. was I saw Sammi and i chose to stay ,. You obviously found both her attractive and her service enjoyable.
At anytime did she discuss anything that made you feel uncomfortable or have the right to demand/ask she reveal to you anything of hers which is private and confidential ? No
You stayed you enjoyed yourself . You made a choice to stay, which is consent..
But you’re confusing two different things.
Misrepresentation and CONSENT.
Fake photos. Fake age. Fake nationality.
That’s misrepresentation.
Here, you chose to book her from her profile.
You met her.
You saw the woman standing in front of you.
You chose to go ahead.
She gave you the service you agreed to and paid for.
Did you enjoy it?
Was it what you expected?
Then later you “found” something out about her private history and suddenly the whole transaction becomes dishonest?
I could just as easily say:
I thought I booked a straight woman. Later I found out she was a lesbian. Now I feel deceived because of everything I told her during the session.
Weak argument?
Of course.
That’s the point.
It has about as much to do with fake ages, fake nationalities and fake photos as this does.
Your argument still starts with one assumption:
“A trans woman is not a woman.”
That’s your opinion.
Not a consumer fact.
And it still doesn’t cancel HER RIGHT TO SAFETY AND PRIVACY.
Her personal, medical and surgical history is HERS.
Unless SHE CONSENTS to it being disclosed.
I just found out that op has grounds to make a police report under consent laws.
Op, go to your police station and make a report
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|
|