|
With such powerful tools for day to day use, would be really interested to what/how AI has affected your punting life.
To make a start,
Pros
- A lot more AI porn generated - even though fake, it can be fairly convincing
- Can help summarise large amounts of reviews to conclude worth it or not
Cons
- Starting to see more AI generated reviews which can feel fake or generic
- Shop photos generating AI photos, can be misleading and different altogether
Anyone else use it?
Wish I knew, much less understand, how to use those AI stuff. God knows what other stuff these GenZ's (if that's the correct term) come ups with everyday~ I'm too damn old-fashioned and an oldie, lol
If I understand it correctly, those major Kpop agencies battle frequently against those using that stuff on their kpop (girl) groups.
I'm hearing you and not going to lie, it did take a while for me to get started, but you can ask the agent to teach you how to better prompt it. It's also great at teaching, you just have to start!Originally Posted by OmniMime
I don't use AI at all for punting so it hasn't affected my decisons, all my choices are based on how I feel about a girl based on photos, profile, staff/friend recommendations or ARs that I read myself.
In regards to the cons, I have seen some people (mostly privates) use AI to make their appearance look flawless which is a bit misleading. It's always been a thing with professional photoshoot touch ups but some of these photo correctors take that to the extreme where rather than a photoshop touchup they're looking unaturally 'perfect'.
An example below, this isn't even an extreme i've seen a lot of photos where it's smoothed out even more while remaining very sharp and vibrant with the colors pumped up to make the photo pop and look very HD.
I've seen some absolutely trash AI ARs as well, though I've also seen some ESL users use AI to tidy up their ARs which I think is fine.
I think the main difference AI has brought to punting is an improvement in the tech, a lot more people that aren't professional developers/programmers are able to build apps, tools, sites and so on to make our punting choices easier and more informed. So while I don't use AI directly for punting, I'm using it indirectly through the use of these newly emerging tools and sites.
my 2026 punts https://ginzaroster.com/Lists/View/blidbla86
Hate the heavy handed use of AI for the girls photos in shops like 161 Chatswood. It’s disgraceful.
Just save everyone some time by posting realistic photos of the actual girls rather than something that doesn’t have an ounce of semblance. This way, punters won’t be deterred by booking a girl they’ve never seen IRL or waste time having to view lineups.
Yeah agreed here.
But I suppose if the bait snags a fish, it's better than nothing from the shops perspective.
I used to go there once a week/fortnight, but I haven’t been since they started using AI extensively. I just have no idea what I’m walking into so they’ve lost me as a customer.
Sunflower Crows Nest has updated their website.
Obviously AI involved in animating em old photos. Definitely made the image 'pop' much better, with minimal alteration.
BUT, I dont know how real the photos were in the first place anyway.
Some shops do declare the photos being: touched up, similar photos used and all that.
As a casual punter, data availability provided, I love to just punch in few criteria* in a search tool and have some suggestions spat out for me. Therefore, loving how sydneyheaven.com is developing.
* like: how many km from x, price, time, some physical features, service inclusions/exclusions, ratings.
Tbf at least I appreciate that they openly state that they use AI to make the videos.
I know it’s a low bar but least they come out and say it
The photos are accurate though. I think they're real photos but they just used ai to make them animated.
I'm just surprised that the videos came out so badly even when they're using AI to generate it.
For example Yumi's videos. She's got legs to die for. But if you look at the video on her profile, her legs are cut off at the ankles. Anyone with even a small knowledge about photography knows that you never do a full body shot and leave out any part of their legs. That just makes their legs look shorter than they really are if you did that.
Almost every video of the girls on their website show this same weird camera angle. Full body shot but with the legs chopped off at the ankles. So they all look like stubby legged girls.
What AI they using, must be a stupid one loll...
I can't see any positives in this thread. Fuck that shit.
.... exactly what I'm thinking every time I hear Albo the weasel, Dumbo the wingnut treasurer, or the climate dope Bowen.....they can stick their speeches and policies up their fucken arse.
Anyways on the subject of AI, won't be long before shops use AI to artificially inseminate chick photos.
Weirdly specific tangent to go off on.
Wow just saw Sunflower's website.
Whilst the videos can be quite convincing, are the body's accurate at all?
I don't like this at all, almost feels like it can be deceiving. I think I might even prefer no photos, but a 100% accurate and honest description in words.
The bodies for the girls I’ve seen are accurate, and in my opinion even the AI videos seem to be pretty spot on with how they move. I think they’ve done a really good job with the videos, I think more stores should do this. Better than the fake stuff you see on so many other websites anyway (eg 161 Chatswood)
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|
|
Reply With Quote