Quote Originally Posted by Violent Martin View Post
Is 'lady boy' a new politcally correct term? Does it apply just to the Thai ones?

I have always refered to them as 'drag queens'. This is how they also referred to themselves. But that terminology is probably now outdated.

Its funny the power a label can have isn't it? I wonder if people in this thread would be confortable talking about the feminine allure of 'drag queens' (sir laughalot) or posting photos of 'male tranvestites' erect cocks (ahlungor). probably not

Anyway, I don't feel anything one way or the other about homosexuals / drag queens etc. Neither lust nor disgust.

However, I do find the self mutilation thing (cutting off of penis) and disfigurement (breast implants and hormone therapy) abhorent and disgusting. Its perverse and self destructive behaviour
Attractive shemales/ladyboys are more feminine than many women.
They aspire to femininity, they want femininity. Breasts, vagina and womb do not make a woman.
Otherwise, we'd consider the ugliest mongrel a real woman. Being a woman is as much psychological as
physiological. You can't possibly think Sarah Hanson Young, Judith Lucy and Hannah Gadsby are women
and the beautiful ladyboys shown above are men who have simply destroyed their bodies on a whim.
The fact you still refer to them as men suggests you have very antiquated and inaccurate views.
If someone held a gun to your head and said you have to rumble with either a beautiful Ladyboy, Sarah Hanson Young or
Judith Lucy, who would you pick? I give you the Victoria Cross for bravery if you pick Sarah Hanson Young or Judith Lucy.